Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26923432›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2016

Recreational physical activity and ovarian cancer risk in African American women.

Sarah E Abbott, Elisa V Bandera, Bo Qin, Lauren C Peres, Patricia G Moorman, Jill Barnholtz-Sloan, Ann G Schwartz, Ellen Funkhouser, Edward S Peters, Michele L Cote and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prevention of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a review.Cancer biology & medicine · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah E AbbottDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Elisa V BanderaDepartment of Population Science, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Bo QinDepartment of Population Science, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Lauren C PeresDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Patricia G MoormanDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Jill Barnholtz-SloanCase Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ann G SchwartzDepartment of Oncology and the Karmanos Cancer Institute Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Ellen FunkhouserDivision of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Edward S PetersEpidemiology Program, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Public Health, New Orleans, Los Angeles.
Michele L CoteDepartment of Oncology and the Karmanos Cancer Institute Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Anthony J AlbergHollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Paul TerryDepartment of Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center-Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Melissa BondyCancer Prevention and Population Sciences Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Lisa E PaddockCancer Research Program, New Jersey State Cancer Registry, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Sydnee CrankshawDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Frances WangDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Fabian CamachoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Joellen M SchildkrautDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
University of Virginia · USDuke Medical Center · USRutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USCase Western Reserve University · USChildren's Cancer Center · USDuke University Hospital · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USMUSC Hollings Cancer Center · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Tennessee Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PAUL M STEMMER · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
Epidemiology of Ovarian Cancer in African-American WomenR01CA142081 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SCHILDKRAUT, JOELLEN M. · 2010 to 2015
$10.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The literature on recreational physical activity (RPA) and ovarian cancer risk is inconclusive and most studies of RPA and ovarian cancer have been conducted in white populations. This study is the first to investigate the association between RPA and ovarian cancer in an exclusively African American (AA) population. We analyzed data from an ongoing U.S. population-based, case-control study of AA women, which included 393 women recently diagnosed with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (IEOC) and 611 controls. A baseline interview assessed RPA frequency, intensity, and duration. Each RPA intensity was assigned a metabolic equivalent of task (MET) value and MET-min/week were calculated. Unconditional multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate associations between RPA and IEOC risk. Compared with sedentary women, predominantly mild intensity RPA was significantly inversely associated with IEOC risk for women reporting above median (>297) MET-min/week (odds ratio [OR] = 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34, 0.78) and nonsignificantly for <297 MET-min/week (OR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.44, 1.12). Predominantly moderate intensity RPA was associated with significantly increased risk for women reporting above median (>540) MET-min/week (OR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.03, 2.23). Predominantly strenuous intensity RPA was nonsignificantly associated with lower IEOC risk for women reporting above median (>1800) MET-min/week (OR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.33, 1.57). The inverse associations for mild and strenuous intensity RPA were most pronounced in obese women (body mass index >30 kg/m(2) ). The findings that mild and strenuous RPA may reduce the risk of IEOC particularly among obese women are difficult to reconcile with the increased risk observed for moderate RPA. Further research is warranted to determine whether these findings are genuine and, if so, their mechanistic basis.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanMotor ActivityRecreationAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesComorbidityFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOdds RatioOvarian NeoplasmsPopulation SurveillanceRiskUnited StatesYoung AdultAfrican Americanovarian cancerphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID26923432
PMCPMC4924390
OpenAlexW2278982310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.