Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26922904›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2016

E-learning in order to improve drug prescription for hospitalized older patients: a cluster-randomized controlled study.

Carlotta Franchi, Mauro Tettamanti, Codjo Dgnefa Djade, Luca Pasina, Pier Mannuccio Mannucci, Graziano Onder, Gualberto Gussoni, Dario Manfellotto, Stefano Bonassi, Francesco Salerno and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. E-learning for health professionals.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. FORTA Score and Negative Outcomes in Older Adults: Insights from Italian Internal Medicine Wards.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlotta FranchiLaboratory for Quality Assessment of Geriatric Therapies and Services, Department of Neuroscience, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milan, Italy.
Mauro TettamantiLaboratory for Quality Assessment of Geriatric Therapies and Services, Department of Neuroscience, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milan, Italy.
Codjo Dgnefa DjadeLaboratory for Quality Assessment of Geriatric Therapies and Services, Department of Neuroscience, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milan, Italy.
Luca PasinaLaboratory for Quality Assessment of Geriatric Therapies and Services, Department of Neuroscience, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milan, Italy.
Pier Mannuccio MannucciA. Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, IRCCS - Maggiore Hospital Foundation, Milan, Italy.
Graziano OnderDepartment of Geriatrics, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Gualberto GussoniFADOI Foundation, Research Department, Milan, Italy.
Dario ManfellottoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli-AFaR, Rome, Italy.
Stefano BonassiArea of Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology, IRCCS - San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.
Francesco SalernoDepartment of Medical and Surgery Sciences, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Italy.
Alessandro NobiliLaboratory for Quality Assessment of Geriatric Therapies and Services, Department of Neuroscience, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milan, Italy.
ELICADHE Investigators
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITFatebenefratelli Hospital · ITFondazione FADOI · ITIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITOspedale Maggiore · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of an e-learning educational program meant to foster the quality of drug prescription in hospitalized elderly patients.

methodsTwenty geriatric and internal medicine wards were randomized to intervention (e-learning educational program) or control (basic geriatric pharmacology notions). Logistic regression analysis was used in order to assess the effect of the intervention on the use of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM, primary outcome) at hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were a reduced prevalence of at least one potential drug-drug interaction (DDI) and potentially severe DDI at discharge. Mortality rate and incidence of re-hospitalizations were other secondary outcomes assessed at the 12-month follow-up.

resultsA total of 697 patients (347 in the intervention and 350 in the control arms) were enrolled. No difference in the prevalence of PIM at discharge was found between arms (OR 1.29 95%CI 0.87-1.91). We also found no decrease in the prevalence of DDI (OR 0.67 95%CI 0.34-1.28) and potentially severe DDI (OR 0.86 95%CI 0.63-1.15) at discharge, nor in mortality rates and incidence of re-hospitalization at 12-month follow-up.

conclusionsThis e-learning educational program had no clear effect on the quality of drug prescription and clinical outcomes in hospitalized elderly patients. Given the high prevalence of PIMs and potential DDIs recorded in the frame of this study, other approaches should be developed in order to improve the quality of drug prescription in this population.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDrug InteractionsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEducation, Medical, ContinuingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansInappropriate PrescribingInternetLogistic ModelsMalePatient DischargePractice Patterns, Physicians'Prevalencecomprehensive geriatric assessmentdrug-drug interactiondrug prescriptionelderly peopleE-learningpotentially inappropriate medication

Identifiers

PMID26922904
PMCPMC4917810
OpenAlexW2289275714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.