ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2016
Coronary Sinus Stent: Could It Help in Refractory Chronic Stable Angina?
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coronary Sinus Reducer for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Angina: Will This Challenge the Treatment of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions?Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- Feature tracking and mapping analysis of myocardial response to improved perfusion reserve in patients with refractory angina treated by coronary sinus Reducer implantation: a CMR study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Refractory angina is a life-disabling disease, even with the discovery of antianginal drugs and the advances in revascularization surgically or percutaneously to improve symptoms. Over the last decade a renewal of interest in an old surgical modality of narrowing the coronary sinus has evolved. Although the surgical procedure idea was born in 1940 it was overshadowed by the development of coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous interventions. Recently, a percutaneous approach of reducing the coronary sinus size has been developed and several clinical studies have been reported in refractory angina patients. We review the history of coronary sinus intervention, and explore coronary sinus stent possible mechanism of action, device design, and the clinical data supporting its use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.