Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26922586›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2016

Utilisation of prescription and over-the-counter triptans: a cross-sectional study in Stockholm, Sweden.

Pia Frisk, Sofia K Sporrong, Gunnar Ljunggren, Björn Wettermark, Mia von Euler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pia FriskDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala university, Box 591, Uppsala, SE-751 24, Sweden. pia.frisk@farmbio.uu.se.
Sofia K SporrongDepartment of Pharmacy, Section for Social and Clinical Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark.
Gunnar LjunggrenDepartment of Healthcare development, Public Healthcare Services Committee, Stockholm County Council, Box 6909, Stockholm, SE-102 39, Sweden.
Björn WettermarkDepartment of Healthcare development, Public Healthcare Services Committee, Stockholm County Council, Box 6909, Stockholm, SE-102 39, Sweden.
Mia von EulerDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Sjukhusbacken 10, Stockholm, SE-118 83, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTriptans are widely used in acute migraine, and in some countries, they are also available over-the-counter (OTC). In Sweden, sales have increased for both prescription and OTC triptans. This study aimed to describe current prescribing and utilisation patterns of prescription and OTC triptans in Stockholm, Sweden.

methodsRegister data from 4759 patients dispensed triptans in 2014 were used to study documented diagnosis of migraine, concomitant acute and preventive treatment for migraine, and contraindications. Survey data from 49 patients purchasing OTC triptans in three pharmacies were used to capture physician-diagnosed migraine, concomitant acute and preventive treatment for migraine, a behaviour of combining or alternating between prescription and OTC triptans, and pharmacy counselling rates.

resultsAmong the prescription triptan users, 52 % had a recorded diagnosis of migraine, 48 % had no other acute treatment, preventive treatment was rare (12 %) and contraindications were found in 2 % of the patients. Among the OTC triptan users, the majority (63 %) had been diagnosed by a physician and had a history of prescription triptan use, but combining or alternating between OTC and prescription triptans was rare. Concomitant acute treatment was reported in 53 % and preventive treatment was rare (4 %), despite high self-reported migraine frequencies. Some off-label use was detected, despite moderate to high counselling rates.

conclusionTriptans are prescribed with attention to safety but with poor recording of migraine diagnosis. OTC triptan users generally have a history of prescription triptan use. Preventive treatment rates are low in both groups. Strategies to discern patients who need other treatment options should be considered.

Indexed as

Nonprescription DrugsPrescription DrugsAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolCitiesContraindicationsCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Therapy, CombinationDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNonprescription DrugsPrescription DrugsTryptaminesDrug utilisationOTCOver-the-counterPrescriptionSurveyTriptans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.