Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26922481›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2016

Variation in primary cesarean delivery rates by individual physician within a single-hospital laborist model.

Torri D Metz, Amanda A Allshouse, Sara A Babcock Gilbert, Reina Doyle, Angie Tong, J Christopher Carey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cesarean overuse and the culture of care.Health services research · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Torri D MetzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO. Electronic address: Torri.Metz@dhha.org.
Amanda A AllshouseDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health at the University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO.
Sara A Babcock GilbertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Reina DoyleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO.
Angie TongRocky Mountain Poison and Drug Center, Denver, CO.
J Christopher CareyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO.
Denver Health Medical Center · USColorado School of Public Health · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USWashington Poison Center · US

Funding

Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
Developing Infrastructure for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research at Denver HealthR24HS022143 · AHRQ · DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL AUTHORITY · PI HAVRANEK, EDWARD PAUL · 2013 to 2017
$4.9M
AHRQ HHS R24 HS022143AHRQ HHS R24 HS022143-01NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaborist practice models are associated with lower rates of cesarean delivery than individual private practice models in several studies; however, this effect is not uniform. Further exploration of laborist models may help us better understand the observed decrease in rates of cesarean delivery in some hospitals that implement a laborist model.

objectiveOur objective was to evaluate the degree of variation in rates of primary cesarean delivery by individual laborists within a single institution that uses a laborist model. In addition, we sought to evaluate whether differences in rates of cesarean delivery resulted in different maternal or short-term neonatal outcomes. STUDY

designAt this teaching institution, one laborist (either a generalist or maternal-fetal medicine attending physician) is directly responsible for labor and delivery management during each shift. No patients are followed in a private practice model nor are physicians incentivized to perform deliveries. We retrospectively identified all laborists who delivered nulliparous, term women with cephalic singletons at this institution from 2007 to 2014. Overall and individual primary cesarean delivery rates were reported as percentages with exact Pearson 95% confidence intervals. Laborists were grouped by tertile as having low, medium, or high rates of cesarean delivery. Characteristics of the women delivered, indications for cesarean delivery, and short-term neonatal outcomes were compared between these groups. A binomial regression model of cesarean delivery was estimated, where the relative rates of each laborist compared with the lowest-unadjusted laborist rate were calculated; a second model was estimated to adjust for patient-level maternal characteristics.

resultsTwenty laborists delivered 2224 nulliparous, term women with cephalic singletons. The overall cesarean delivery rate was 24.1% (95% confidence interval 21.4-26.8). In an unadjusted binomial model, the overall effect of individual laborist was significant (P < .001), and a 2.9-fold (1.5-5.4, P = .001) variation between the cesarean delivery rates of the greatest (35.9%) and lowest (12.5%) physicians was observed. When adjusted for hypertensive disease, gestational age at delivery, race, and maternal age, the physician effect remained overall significant (P = .0265) with the difference between physicians expanding to 3.58 (1.72-7.47, P <. 001). Between groups of laborists with low, medium, and high rates of cesarean delivery, patient demographics and clinical characteristics of the population managed were clinically similar and not different statistically. The primary indication for cesarean delivery did not differ between groups. Similarly there were no differences in short-term neonatal outcomes, including Apgar scores, arterial cord blood pH, or the incidence of neonatal encephalopathy.

conclusionThe 3-fold variation in cesarean delivery rates between laborists at the same institution without observed differences in patient characteristics or short-term neonatal outcomes draws attention to the impact of individual physician decision-making on cesarean delivery rates even within a laborist care model. Further exploration of the role of individual physician decision-making on cesarean rates may help to better elucidate the effect of the laborist model.

Indexed as

Models, OrganizationalAdultCesarean SectionCohort StudiesExtraction, ObstetricalFaculty, MedicalFemaleFetal BloodHospitals, TeachingHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationLabor Stage, SecondObstetric Labor ComplicationsParityPregnancyRetrospective StudiesCesareanCesarean delivery ratelaboristphysician traits

Identifiers

PMID26922481
PMCPMC4808612
OpenAlexW2203750246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.