ArticlePharmacoEconomics2016
Economic Evaluation of Mental Health Interventions: A Guide to Costing Approaches.
Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Psychosocial impacts of post-disaster compensation processes: narrative systematic review.BMC psychology · 2024Pooled it
- Economic Evaluations of Mental Health Programs for Children and Adolescents in the United States: A Systematic Review.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2021Pooled it
- Health economic evaluations of non-pharmacological interventions for persons with dementia and their informal caregivers: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Examining the Association between Abstinence from Smoking and Healthcare Costs among Patients with Cancer.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024Article
- Assessing the validity and responsiveness of a generic preference quality of life measure in the context of posttraumatic stress disorder.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Planetary Health and Mental Health Nexus: Benefit of Environmental Management.Annals of global health · 2023Article
- Economic analyses of behavioral health intervention implementation: Perspective on stakeholder engagement.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Dissemination Strategies to Accelerate the Policy Impact of Children's Mental Health Services Research.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2020Article
- Health economics and quality of life in a feasibility RCT of paediatric acute appendicitis: a protocol study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Costing approaches in the economic evaluation of mental health interventions are complicated by the broad societal impacts of mental health, and the multidisciplinary nature of mental health interventions. This paper aims to provide a practical guide to costing approaches across a wide range of care inputs and illness consequences relevant to the treatment of mental health. The resources needed to deliver mental health interventions are highly variable and depend on treatment settings (institutional, community), treatment providers (medical, non-medical) and formats (individual, group, electronic). Establishing the most appropriate perspective is crucial when assessing the costs associated with a particular mental health problem or when evaluating interventions to treat them. We identify five key cost categories (social care, informal care, production losses, crime and education) impacted by mental health and discuss contemporary issues in resource use measurement and valuation, including data sources and resource use instruments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26922076What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.