Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26921866›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2016

Predicting persistence to antidepressant treatment in administrative claims data: Considering the influence of refill delays and prior persistence on other medications.

Greta A Bushnell, Til Stürmer, Alice White, Virginia Pate, Sonja A Swanson, Deborah Azrael, Matthew Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Greta A BushnellDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: gbushnel@live.unc.edu.
Til StürmerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Alice WhiteDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Virginia PateDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Sonja A SwansonDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard University, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Deborah AzraelDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard University, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Matthew MillerDepartment of Health Science, Northeastern University, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Propensity Scores and Preventive Drug Use in the ElderlyR01AG023178 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI STURMER, TIL · 2005 to 2014
$2.7M
Suicide attempts and unintentional injury among older Americans on psychotropicsR01MH085021 · NIMH · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI MILLER, MATTHEW J · 2010 to 2012
$821k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG023178NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who begin antidepressant treatment discontinue use before for six months, the recommended minimum treatment length. This study sought to identify predictors of six-month antidepressant persistence including predictors utilizing patients' electronic prescription records.

methodsCommercially insured children (3-17 years) and adults (18-64 years) with MDD who initiated antidepressant treatment, 1/1/2003-2/28/2010, were assessed for six-month persistence (based on prescriptions' days supply, allowing a 30-day grace period). Antidepressant persistence prediction models were developed separately for children and adults. Two additional measures, days without medication between the first and second antidepressant fill (children and adults) and prior persistence on other medications (adults only), were added to the models, concordance (c) statistics were compared and risk reclassification evaluated.

resultsAmong children (n=8837 children) and adults (n=47,495) with MDD, six-month antidepressant persistence was low and varied by age (37%, 18-24 years to 52%, 3-12 and 50-64 years). Independent baseline predictors of persistence were identified, with model c-statistics: children=0.582, adults=0.584. Patients with more days without medication between fills were less likely to be persistent (10-30 vs. 0 days, children: RR=0.72, adults: RR=0.74), as were adults not previously persistent to other medications (RR=0.73). LIMITATIONS: The definition of six-month persistence is dependent on correct days supply values and the grace period utilized; potential predictors were limited to measures available in claims data.

conclusionsSix-month antidepressant persistence was low and overall prediction of persistence was poor; however, days without medication between fills and prior persistence on other medications marginally improved the ability to predict antidepressant persistence.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdministrative Claims, HealthcareAdolescentAdultAntidepressive AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressantsPersistencePredictionRefill delayRisk reclassificationSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID26921866
PMCPMC5033109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.