Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26921337›Full record

ArticleCancer research2016

Mutational Landscape of Aggressive Prostate Tumors in African American Men.

Karla J Lindquist, Pamela L Paris, Thomas J Hoffmann, Niall J Cardin, Rémi Kazma, Joel A Mefford, Jeffrey P Simko, Vy Ngo, Yalei Chen, Albert M Levin and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. SOMATIC MUTATION PROFILES IN COLORECTAL CANCERS DIFFER BY POPULATION.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Race and prostate cancer: genomic landscape.Nature reviews. Urology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karla J LindquistDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Pamela L ParisDepartment of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Thomas J HoffmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Niall J CardinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Rémi KazmaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Joel A MeffordDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Jeffrey P SimkoDepartment of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Vy NgoDepartment of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Yalei ChenDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Albert M LevinDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Dhananjay ChitaleDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Brian T HelfandRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
William J CatalonaRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Benjamin A RybickiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
John S WitteDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. jwitte@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Translational InformaticsP30CA082103 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Jennifer Leigh Clarke · 1999 to 2026
$209.7M
Tumor Environment and Metastasis (TEAM) Research ProgramP30CA060553 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Daniela E Matei · 1993 to 2026
$153.9M
Prostate Cancer Susceptibility: The ICPCG StudyU01CA089600 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI THIBODEAU, STEPHEN NORMAN · 2002 to 2016
$27.3M
SUPPRESSIVE ROLE OF ANDROGEN RESPONSE GENE CALRETICULIN IN PROSTATE CANCERP50CA090386 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CRAWFORD, SUSAN · 2001 to 2013
$25.1M
Targeting FOXA1-downstream pathways: a novel therapeutic strategy for castration-resistant prostate cancerP50CA180995 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ABDULKADIR, SARKI A., HUSSAIN, MAHA H · 2015 to 2025
$19.9M
GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION IN PROSTATE CANCERR01ES011126 · NIEHS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI RYBICKI, BENJAMIN A. · 2000 to 2017
$8.0M
Training in Molecular& Genetic Epidemiology of CancerR25CA112355 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WITTE, JOHN S. · 2005 to 2018
$6.5M
Genetic Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer Risk and ProgressionR01CA088164 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VAN DEN EEDEN, STEPHEN K., WITTE, JOHN S. · 2000 to 2015
$6.1M
Genomewide Association Study of Prostate CancerU01CA127298 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WITTE, JOHN S. · 2008 to 2012
$5.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA060553NCI NIH HHS P30 CA082103NCI NIH HHS P50 CA090386NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180995NCI NIH HHS R01 CA088164NCI NIH HHS R25 CA112355NCI NIH HHS U01 CA089600NCI NIH HHS U01 CA127298NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES011126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed and second most fatal nonskin cancer among men in the United States. African American men are two times more likely to develop and die of prostate cancer compared with men of other ancestries. Previous whole genome or exome tumor-sequencing studies of prostate cancer have primarily focused on men of European ancestry. In this study, we sequenced and characterized somatic mutations in aggressive (Gleason ≥7, stage ≥T2b) prostate tumors from 24 African American patients. We describe the locations and prevalence of small somatic mutations (up to 50 bases in length), copy number aberrations, and structural rearrangements in the tumor genomes compared with patient-matched normal genomes. We observed several mutation patterns consistent with previous studies, such as large copy number aberrations in chromosome 8 and complex rearrangement chains. However, TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions and PTEN losses occurred in only 21% and 8% of the African American patients, respectively, far less common than in patients of European ancestry. We also identified mutations that appeared specific to or more common in African American patients, including a novel CDC27-OAT gene fusion occurring in 17% of patients. The genomic aberrations reported in this study warrant further investigation of their biologic significant role in the incidence and clinical outcomes of prostate cancer in African Americans. Cancer Res; 76(7); 1860-8. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanHumansMaleMutationProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26921337
PMCPMC4772140
OpenAlexW2275072342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.