ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016
Does 3D Phenotyping Yield Substantial Insights in the Genetics of the Mouse Mandible Shape?
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging descriptor learning and functional map-based shape matching for automated anatomical Landmarking in mouse mandibles.Journal of anatomy · 2025Article
- Leveraging Descriptor Learning and Functional Map-based Shape Matching for Automatic Landmark Acquisition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Can morphotaxa be assessed with photographs? Estimating the accuracy of two-dimensional cranial geometric morphometrics for the study of threatened populations of African monkeys.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2022Article
- A complex genetic architecture underlies mandibular evolution in big mice from Gough Island.Genetics · 2022Article
- Testing the accuracy of 3D automatic landmarking via genome-wide association studies.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Modelling the shape of the pig scapula.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2020Article
- Genetic analysis of the mandible morphology in DDD.Cg-Journal of genetics · 2019Article
- The genetic architecture of adaptation: convergence and pleiotropy in Heliconius wing pattern evolution.Heredity · 2019Article
- Article
- Mouse Skull Mean Shape and Shape Robustness Rely on Different Genetic Architectures and Different Loci.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Genetic mapping of molar size relations identifies inhibitory locus for third molars in mice.Heredity · 2018Article
- A population level atlas of Mus musculus craniofacial skeleton and automated image-based shape analysis.Journal of anatomy · 2017Article
- Unveiling the third dimension of tooth shape: 2D versus 3D geometric morphometry of human post-canine dentition.Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We describe the application of high-resolution 3D microcomputed tomography, together with 3D landmarks and geometric morphometrics, to validate and further improve previous quantitative genetic studies that reported QTL responsible for variation in the mandible shape of laboratory mice using a new backcross between C57BL/6J and A/J inbred strains. Despite the increasing availability of 3D imaging techniques, artificial flattening of the mandible by 2D imaging techniques seems at first an acceptable compromise for large-scale phenotyping protocols, thanks to an abundance of low-cost digital imaging systems such as microscopes or digital cameras. We evaluated the gain of information from considering explicitly this additional third dimension, and also from capturing variation on the bone surface where no precise anatomical landmark can be marked. Multivariate QTL mapping conducted with different landmark configurations (2D vs. 3D; manual vs. semilandmarks) broadly agreed with the findings of previous studies. Significantly more QTL (23) were identified and more precisely mapped when the mandible shape was captured with a large set of semilandmarks coupled with manual landmarks. It appears that finer phenotypic characterization of the mandibular shape with 3D landmarks, along with higher density genotyping, yields better insights into the genetic architecture of mandibular development. Most of the main variation is, nonetheless, preferentially embedded in the natural 2D plane of the hemi-mandible, reinforcing the results of earlier influential investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.