Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26921167›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2016

Aortic arch and common carotid artery plaques with soft components pose a substantial risk of cerebral embolization during carotid stenting.

Péter Szikra, Krisztina Boda, Ferenc Rarosi, Attila Thury, Pál Barzó, Tamás Németh, Erika Vörös

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Carotid artery stenting for patients with occipital-vertebral anastomosis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Péter SzikraDepartment of Radiology, Medical University Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary peterszikra70@gmail.com.
Krisztina BodaDepartment of Medical Physics and Informatics, Medical University Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Ferenc RarosiDepartment of Medical Physics and Informatics, Medical University Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Attila ThuryDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Pál BarzóDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Szeged, Medical University Center, Szeged, Hungary.
Tamás NémethDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Szeged, Medical University Center, Szeged, Hungary.
Erika VörösDepartment of Radiology, Medical University Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
University of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA higher rate of embolization is considered a disadvantage of carotid stenting (CAS), when compared with carotid endarterectomy. Plaques in the aortic arch (AA) and the common carotid artery (CCA) may be additional sources of embolization to stented internal carotid plaques during CAS. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between these plaques and intracerebral embolization.

methodsWe analyzed the occurrence and composition of plaques in the AA and CCA by computed tomography angiography (CTA) in 101 consecutive cases of CAS. Cases of peri-procedural embolization were detected on diffusion-weighted imaging as lesions demonstrating diffusion restriction. We applied the χ(2) and Fisher's exact tests, as well as logistic regression models.

resultsThe occurrence of plaques in the AA and CCA was significantly related to the appearance of new diffusion-weighted imaging lesions (p = 0.013 and p = 0.004, respectively). Patients with soft plaques in the AA or CCA had a significantly higher risk of embolization than those without plaques (p = 0.012 and p = 0.006, respectively). In contrast, homogeneously calcified plaques did not pose significantly higher risks.

conclusionsSoft plaques in the AA and CCA result in a substantial risk of embolization during CAS. Use of a CTA examination of the AA and the CCA in patients with carotid stenosis may help to select lower-risk patients for CAS.

Indexed as

StentsAgedAorta, ThoracicCarotid Artery, CommonCarotid StenosisComputed Tomography AngiographyDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansIntracranial EmbolismMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPlaque, AtheroscleroticRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAortic archarterial plaquecalcified plaquecarotid arterycarotid stenosiscarotid stentingcerebral embolismcomputed tomographic angiographydiffusion-weighted imagingembolismrisk factorssoft plaque

Identifiers

PMID26921167
PMCPMC4984378
OpenAlexW2284697815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.