Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26921161›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2016

Effects of a Video on Organ Donation Consent Among Primary Care Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Daryl Thornton, Catherine Sullivan, Jeffrey M Albert, Maria Cedeño, Bridget Patrick, Julie Pencak, Kristine A Wong, Margaret D Allen, Linda Kimble, Heather Mekesa and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01697137 (Patient and Physician Intervention to Increase Organ Donation in Primary Care Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01697137 nacompletednot on this map

Patient and Physician Intervention to Increase Organ Donation in Primary Care Settings

TypeinterventionalSponsorCase Western Reserve UniversityRan2012 to 2014Enrolled916ConditionsTissue and Organ Donation, CommunicationArmsParticipant Video and Provider Cueing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for increasing solid organ donor registration.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. The gift of life: Understanding the experiences of organ donor families.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Getting to the 'Why' of Behavior Change.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

J Daryl ThorntonCenter for Reducing Health Disparities, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Rammelkamp R209A, Cleveland, OH, USA. daryl.thornton@case.edu.
Catherine SullivanCenter for Reducing Health Disparities, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Rammelkamp R209A, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jeffrey M AlbertDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Maria CedeñoCenter for Reducing Health Disparities, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Rammelkamp R209A, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Bridget PatrickCenter for Reducing Health Disparities, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Rammelkamp R209A, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Julie PencakCenter for Reducing Health Disparities, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Rammelkamp R209A, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Kristine A Wong, Oakland, CA, USA.
Margaret D AllenBenaroya Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Linda KimbleCleveland Minority Organ Tissue Transplant Education Program (MOTTEP), Cleveland, OH, USA.
Heather MekesaLifeBanc, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Gordon BowenLifeBanc, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Ashwini R SehgalCenter for Reducing Health Disparities, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Rammelkamp R209A, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
Transplant navigator interventuon to overcome barriers to kidney transplantionP60MD002265 · NIMHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI SEHGAL, ASHWINI · 2007 to 2016
$10.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD002265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow organ donation rates remain a major barrier to organ transplantation.

objectiveWe aimed to determine the effect of a video and patient cueing on organ donation consent among patients meeting with their primary care provider.

designThis was a randomized controlled trial between February 2013 and May 2014.

settingThe waiting rooms of 18 primary care clinics of a medical system in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. PATIENTS: The study included 915 patients over 15.5 years of age who had not previously consented to organ donation.

interventionsJust prior to their clinical encounter, intervention patients (n = 456) watched a 5-minute organ donation video on iPads and then choose a question regarding organ donation to ask their provider. Control patients (n = 459) visited their provider per usual routine. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who consented for organ donation. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who discussed organ donation with their provider and the proportion who were satisfied with the time spent with their provider during the clinical encounter. KEY

resultsIntervention patients were more likely than control patients to consent to donate organs (22 % vs. 15 %, OR 1.50, 95%CI 1.10-2.13). Intervention patients were also more likely to have donation discussions with their provider (77 % vs. 18 %, OR 15.1, 95%CI 11.1-20.6). Intervention and control patients were similarly satisfied with the time they spent with their provider (83 % vs. 86 %, OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.61-1.25). LIMITATION: How the observed increases in organ donation consent might translate into a greater organ supply is unclear.

conclusionWatching a brief video regarding organ donation and being cued to ask a primary care provider a question about donation resulted in more organ donation discussions and an increase in organ donation consent. Satisfaction with the time spent during the clinical encounter was not affected.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01697137.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansInformed ConsentMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareTissue and Organ ProcurementVideo Recordingdonor designationminority donationorgan donationorgan transplantationpublic attitudesracial disparitiesrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID26921161
PMCPMC4945548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.