Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26921069›Full record

ArticleTheoretical biology & medical modelling2016

A mathematical model of tumor growth and its response to single irradiation.

Yoichi Watanabe, Erik L Dahlman, Kevin Z Leder, Susanta K Hui

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theoretical biology & medical modelling, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Tumor organoids modeling reveals timed responses and interplay of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoichi WatanabeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St.SE, MMC-494, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. watan016@umn.edu.
Erik L DahlmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St.SE, MMC-494, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. dahlman@physics.umn.edu.
Kevin Z LederIndustrial and Systems Engineering, University of Minnesota, 111 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. lede0024@umn.edu.
Susanta K HuiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St.SE, MMC-494, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. huixx019@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMathematical modeling of biological processes is widely used to enhance quantitative understanding of bio-medical phenomena. This quantitative knowledge can be applied in both clinical and experimental settings. Recently, many investigators began studying mathematical models of tumor response to radiation therapy. We developed a simple mathematical model to simulate the growth of tumor volume and its response to a single fraction of high dose irradiation. The modelling study may provide clinicians important insights on radiation therapy strategies through identification of biological factors significantly influencing the treatment effectiveness.

methodsWe made several key assumptions of the model. Tumor volume is composed of proliferating (or dividing) cancer cells and non-dividing (or dead) cells. Tumor growth rate (or tumor volume doubling time) is proportional to the ratio of the volumes of tumor vasculature and the tumor. The vascular volume grows slower than the tumor by introducing the vascular growth retardation factor, θ. Upon irradiation, the proliferating cells gradually die over a fixed time period after irradiation. Dead cells are cleared away with cell clearance time. The model was applied to simulate pre-treatment growth and post-treatment radiation response of rat rhabdomyosarcoma tumors and metastatic brain tumors of five patients who were treated with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS).

resultsBy selecting appropriate model parameters, we showed the temporal variation of the tumors for both the rat experiment and the clinical GKSRS cases could be easily replicated by the simple model. Additionally, the application of our model to the GKSRS cases showed that the α-value, which is an indicator of radiation sensitivity in the LQ model, and the value of θ could be predictors of the post-treatment volume change.

conclusionsThe proposed model was successful in representing both the animal experimental data and the clinically observed tumor volume changes. We showed that the model can be used to find the potential biological parameters, which may be able to predict the treatment outcome. However, there is a large statistical uncertainty of the result due to the small sample size. Therefore, a future clinical study with a larger number of patients is needed to confirm the finding.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCell ProliferationHumansInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsProbabilityRadiosurgeryRadiotherapyRadiotherapy DosageRatsRhabdomyosarcoma

Identifiers

PMID26921069
PMCPMC4769590
OpenAlexW2280635341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.