ArticleTheoretical biology & medical modelling2016
A mathematical model of tumor growth and its response to single irradiation.
Article in Theoretical biology & medical modelling, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploratory personalized radiobiological modeling of bystander and immune effects to inform SFRT-SBRT scheduling.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Tumor organoids modeling reveals timed responses and interplay of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2026Article
- Time-Varying Hormonal Treatment and Metastasis-Free Survival Among ER+ Breast Cancer Patients: A Natural History Modelling Approach.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Developing virtual physiology of human tumor tissue for malignancy assessment.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- CanSeer: a translational methodology for developing personalized cancer models and therapeutics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mathematical modeling in radiotherapy for cancer: a comprehensive narrative review.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Impact of stroma remodeling on forces experienced by cancer cells and stromal cells within a pancreatic tumor tissue.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Article
- New insights into targeted therapy of glioblastoma using smart nanoparticles.Cancer cell international · 2024Review
- An AI-based approach for modeling the synergy between radiotherapy and immunotherapy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Simulating tumor volume dynamics in response to radiotherapy: Implications of model selection.Journal of theoretical biology · 2024Article
- Modeling Physical Forces Experienced by Cancer and Stromal Cells Within Different Organ-Specific Tumor Tissue.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2024Article
- Radiation necrosis after radiation therapy treatment of brain metastases: A computational approach.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Robust Control of Repeated Drug Administration with Variable Doses Based on Uncertain Mathematical Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Mathematical model combined with microdosimetric kinetic model for tumor volume calculation in stereotactic body radiation therapy.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Multicomponent mathematical model for tumor volume calculation with setup error using single-isocenter stereotactic radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023Article
- Model-based assessment of combination therapies - ranking of radiosensitizing agents in oncology.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Article
- Tumor heterogeneity: preclinical models, emerging technologies, and future applications.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Patient-Derived Multiple Myeloma 3D Models for Personalized Medicine-Are We There Yet?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Multiscale modeling of collective cell migration elucidates the mechanism underlying tumor-stromal interactions in different spatiotemporal scales.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMathematical modeling of biological processes is widely used to enhance quantitative understanding of bio-medical phenomena. This quantitative knowledge can be applied in both clinical and experimental settings. Recently, many investigators began studying mathematical models of tumor response to radiation therapy. We developed a simple mathematical model to simulate the growth of tumor volume and its response to a single fraction of high dose irradiation. The modelling study may provide clinicians important insights on radiation therapy strategies through identification of biological factors significantly influencing the treatment effectiveness.
methodsWe made several key assumptions of the model. Tumor volume is composed of proliferating (or dividing) cancer cells and non-dividing (or dead) cells. Tumor growth rate (or tumor volume doubling time) is proportional to the ratio of the volumes of tumor vasculature and the tumor. The vascular volume grows slower than the tumor by introducing the vascular growth retardation factor, θ. Upon irradiation, the proliferating cells gradually die over a fixed time period after irradiation. Dead cells are cleared away with cell clearance time. The model was applied to simulate pre-treatment growth and post-treatment radiation response of rat rhabdomyosarcoma tumors and metastatic brain tumors of five patients who were treated with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS).
resultsBy selecting appropriate model parameters, we showed the temporal variation of the tumors for both the rat experiment and the clinical GKSRS cases could be easily replicated by the simple model. Additionally, the application of our model to the GKSRS cases showed that the α-value, which is an indicator of radiation sensitivity in the LQ model, and the value of θ could be predictors of the post-treatment volume change.
conclusionsThe proposed model was successful in representing both the animal experimental data and the clinically observed tumor volume changes. We showed that the model can be used to find the potential biological parameters, which may be able to predict the treatment outcome. However, there is a large statistical uncertainty of the result due to the small sample size. Therefore, a future clinical study with a larger number of patients is needed to confirm the finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.