Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26920937›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2016

Stimulus intensity modulates multisensory temporal processing.

Juliane Krueger Fister, Ryan A Stevenson, Aaron R Nidiffer, Zachary P Barnett, Mark T Wallace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Development of Multisensory Integration at the Neuronal Level.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Binocular Enhancement of Multisensory Temporal Perception.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Links between temporal acuity and multisensory integration across life span.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juliane Krueger FisterNeuroscience Graduate Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United States; Vanderbilt Brain Institute, United States. Electronic address: juliane.krueger@vanderbilt.edu.
Ryan A StevensonDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United States; Vanderbilt Brain Institute, United States; Vanderbilt University Kennedy Center, United States; Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Canada.
Aaron R NidifferDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United States.
Zachary P BarnettDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United States.
Mark T WallaceDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United States; Vanderbilt Brain Institute, United States; Vanderbilt University Kennedy Center, United States; Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University, United States.

Funding

Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CUTTING, LAURIE E · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Development of Multisensory Cortex: Role of ExperienceR01MH063861 · NIMH · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WALLACE, MARK THOMAS · 2002 to 2012
$3.8M
Evaluation of Sensory Integration Treatment in ASDR34DC010927 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CAMARATA, STEPHEN MARK, WALLACE, MARK THOMAS · 2009 to 2010
$682k
Multisensory Processing Across Lifespan and Links to CognitionR21CA183492 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI NEWHOUSE, PAUL A., WALLACE, MARK THOMAS · 2013 to 2014
$416k
Neuronal Correlates of the Visual Modulation of Auditory PerformanceR21DC014114 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI RAMACHANDRAN, RAMNARAYAN, WALLACE, MARK THOMAS · 2014 to 2015
$416k
Multisensory Integration and Temporal processing in AutismF32DC011993 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI STEVENSON, RYAN ANDREW · 2011 to 2013
$92k
CIHRNCI NIH HHS R21 CA183492NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC011993NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC014114NIDCD NIH HHS R34 DC010927NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the more challenging feats that multisensory systems must perform is to determine which sensory signals originate from the same external event, and thus should be integrated or "bound" into a singular perceptual object or event, and which signals should be segregated. Two important stimulus properties impacting this process are the timing and effectiveness of the paired stimuli. It has been well established that the more temporally aligned two stimuli are, the greater the degree to which they influence one another's processing. In addition, the less effective the individual unisensory stimuli are in eliciting a response, the greater the benefit when they are combined. However, the interaction between stimulus timing and stimulus effectiveness in driving multisensory-mediated behaviors has never been explored - which was the purpose of the current study. Participants were presented with either high- or low-intensity audiovisual stimuli in which stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) were parametrically varied, and were asked to report on the perceived synchrony/asynchrony of the paired stimuli. Our results revealed an interaction between the temporal relationship (SOA) and intensity of the stimuli. Specifically, individuals were more tolerant of larger temporal offsets (i.e., more likely to call them synchronous) when the paired stimuli were less effective. This interaction was also seen in response time (RT) distributions. Behavioral gains in RTs were seen with synchronous relative to asynchronous presentations, but this effect was more pronounced with high-intensity stimuli. These data suggest that stimulus effectiveness plays an underappreciated role in the perception of the timing of multisensory events, and reinforces the interdependency of the principles of multisensory integration in determining behavior and shaping perception.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeTime FactorsYoung AdultAudiovisualCross-modalInverse effectivenessMultisensoryPerceptionSynchrony

Identifiers

PMID26920937
PMCPMC4958503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.