Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26920758›Full record

ArticleGenetics2016

Probabilistic Multilocus Haplotype Reconstruction in Outcrossing Tetraploids.

Chaozhi Zheng, Roeland E Voorrips, Johannes Jansen, Christine A Hackett, Julie Ho, Marco C A M Bink

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. QTL Mapping for Resistance to Cankers Induced byPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Chaozhi ZhengBiometris, Wageningen University and Research Centre, 6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands chaozhi.zheng@wur.nl.
Roeland E VoorripsPlant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre, 6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands.
Johannes JansenBiometris, Wageningen University and Research Centre, 6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands.
Christine A HackettBiomathematics and Statistics Scotland, Dundee DD2 5DA, Scotland.
Julie HoForage Genetics International, Inc., Davis, California 95618-0505.
Marco C A M BinkBiometris, Wageningen University and Research Centre, 6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLBiomathematics and Statistics Scotland · GBForage Genetics International · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For both plant (e.g., potato) and animal (e.g., salmon) species, unveiling the genetic architecture of complex traits is key to the genetic improvement of polyploids in agriculture. F1 progenies of a biparental cross are often used for quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping in outcrossing polyploids, where haplotype reconstruction by identifying the parental origins of marker alleles is necessary. In this paper, we build a novel and integrated statistical framework for multilocus haplotype reconstruction in a full-sib tetraploid family from biallelic marker dosage data collected from single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays or next-generation sequencing technology given a genetic linkage map. Compared to diploids, in tetraploids, additional complexity needs to be addressed, including double reduction and possible preferential pairing of chromosomes. We divide haplotype reconstruction into two stages: parental linkage phasing for reconstructing the most probable parental haplotypes and ancestral inference for probabilistically reconstructing the offspring haplotypes conditional on the reconstructed parental haplotypes. The simulation studies and the application to real data from potato show that the parental linkage phasing is robust to, and that the subsequent ancestral inference is accurate for, complex chromosome pairing behaviors during meiosis, various marker segregation types, erroneous genetic maps except for long-range disturbances of marker ordering, various amounts of offspring dosage errors (up to ∼20%), and various fractions of missing data in parents and offspring dosages.

Indexed as

Crosses, GeneticHaplotypesModels, GeneticQuantitative Trait LociTetraploidyAlgorithmsChromosome PairingComputer SimulationEvolution, MolecularGene DosageGenetic LinkageProbabilitySolanum tuberosumZygoteancestral inferencedouble reductionoutbred populationpolyploidypreferential pairing

Identifiers

PMID26920758
PMCPMC4858767
OpenAlexW2345752170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.