ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2016
The availability and affordability of orphan drugs for rare diseases in China.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Access to single-inhaler triple medicines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China: a national survey on accessibility and utilisation.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Establishment of a value assessment framework for orphan drugs in China: an application of the discrete choice experiment in multicriteria decision analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Budget impact analysis of high-priced orphan medicinal products intended for the treatment of rare diseases in China: evidence from a densely populated metropolis of Chengdu.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence empowering rare diseases: a bibliometric perspective over the last two decades.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Utilization and affordability of health insurance coverage for rare disease drugs in a first-tier city in Northeast China from 2018 to 2021: a study based on the health insurance claims database.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Analysis of affordability differences for rare diseases in China: a comparison across disease types and regions.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Recent landscape and trends for industry-sponsored pediatric clinical trials in China from 2013 to 2022.Pediatric investigation · 2024Article
- Impact of the National Drug Price Negotiation policy on the price, usage, and affordability of anticancer medicines in Shandong Province, China.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Pharmacovigilance for rare diseases: a bibliometrics and knowledge-map analysis based on web of science.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Review
- Cross-national comparative study of orphan drug policies in Saudi Arabia, the United States, and the European Union.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023Article
- Barriers to prophylactic treatment among patients with haemophilia A in Shandong Province, China: a qualitative study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Analysis of Incentive Policies and Initiatives on Orphan Drug Development in China: Challenges, Reforms and Implications.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Literature Review on Health Emigration in Rare Diseases-A Machine Learning Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Is sub-national healthcare social protection sufficient for protecting rare disease patients? the case of China.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Long way to go: Progress of orphan drug accessibility in China from 2017 to 2022.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditures of Turkish households living with rare diseases.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Assessment of the availability of repurposed orphan drugs in India.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Health Policies for Rare Disease Patients: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- A Cross-Sectional Study of Price and Affordability of Drugs for Rare Diseases in Shandong Province, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrphan drugs are intended to treat, prevent or diagnose rare diseases. In recent years, China healthcare policy makers and patients have become increasingly concerned about orphan drug issues. However, very few studies have assessed the availability and affordability of orphan drugs for rare diseases in China. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the availability and affordability of orphan drugs in China and to make suggestions to improve patient access to orphan drugs.
methodsTwo components of the availability of orphan drugs were examined. Market availability was assessed by the extent to which orphan drugs were marketed in China with a comparison to orphan drugs in international markets, such as the U.S., EU and Japan. We conducted surveys and collected data from 24 tertiary public hospitals in China to measure hospital-level availability of orphan drugs. The affordability of orphan drugs was calculated using hospital dispensary prices and was expressed as days of average daily income required for the cost of a course of treatment. Affordability was also analyzed under the Chinese basic medical insurance system.
resultsOrphan drugs approved in the U.S., EU and Japan had 37.8%, 24.6% and 52.4% market availability in China, respectively. Median availability of 31 orphan drugs surveyed at the 24 tertiary public hospitals was 20.8% (very low). Within a periodic treatment course, the average treatment cost of 23 orphan drugs is approximately 4, 843. 5 USD, which equates to 505.6 days of per capita net income for an urban resident with a middle income (187.4 days for a high-income urban resident) or 1,582.8 days's income for a rural resident with a middle income (657.2 days for a high-income rural resident). Except for homoharringtonine, 22 orphan drugs for 14 rare diseases were unaffordable for the most of residents in China. With 5% out-of-pocket expenses, only three generics could be afforded by middle-income residents, whereas seven drugs for high-income urban residents.
conclusionsThe Chinese government can take more responsibility for improving the availability and affordability of orphan drugs through setting up incentive policies and public platforms for sharing of orphan drug information. Control of the high price of orphan drugs, combined with a joint funding model from both government and private enterprise can efficiently reduce the economic burden of affected patients in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.