ArticleEuropean radiology2016
Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy: are two biopsy cores per MRI-lesion required?
Article in European radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of analgesic techniques in MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsy.European radiology · 2019Trial
- Article
- Article
- Prostate cancer detection with transrectal in-bore MRI biopsies: impact of prostate volume and lesion features.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- MRI-guided in-bore biopsy of the prostate - defining the optimal number of cores needed.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Yield of Incremental Biopsy Cores and Second Lesion Sampling for In-Gantry MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2021Article
- Evaluating the efficacy of a low-cost cognitive MRI-targeted prostate biopsy protocol: is there still a role for lower volume centers in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 era?International urology and nephrology · 2020Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion guided seed placement in a phantom: Accuracy between 2-seed versus 1-seed strategies.European journal of radiology · 2020Article
- MRI-guided in-bore biopsy for prostate cancer: what does the evidence say? A case series of 554 patients and a review of the current literature.World journal of urology · 2019Review
- Controversies in MR targeted biopsy: alone or combined, cognitive versus software-based fusion, transrectal versus transperineal approach?World journal of urology · 2019Review
- The Current State of MR Imaging-targeted Biopsy Techniques for Detection of Prostate Cancer.Radiology · 2017Review
- A critical comparison of techniques for MRI-targeted biopsy of the prostate.Translational andrology and urology · 2017Review
- Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches.BioMed research international · 2017Article
- Segmented diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: Application to transperineal in-bore 3T MR image-guided targeted biopsy.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2016Article
- Yield of Repeat Targeted Direct in-Bore Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Biopsy (MRGB) of the Same Lesions in Men Having a Prior Negative Targeted MRGB.Korean journal of radiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluates the feasibility of performing less than two core biopsies per MRI-lesion when performing targeted MR-guided in-bore prostate biopsy.
methodsRetrospectively evaluated were 1545 biopsy cores of 774 intraprostatic lesions (two cores per lesion) in 290 patients (66 ± 7.8 years; median PSA 8.2 ng/ml) regarding prostate cancer (PCa) detection, Gleason score, and tumor infiltration of the first (FBC) compared to the second biopsy core (SBC). Biopsies were acquired under in-bore MR-guidance.
resultsFor the biopsy cores, 491 were PCa positive, 239 of 774 (31 %) were FBC and 252 of 771 (33 %) were SBC (p = 0.4). Patient PCa detection rate based on the FBC vs. SBC were 46 % vs. 48 % (p = 0.6). For clinically significant PCa (Gleason score ≥4 + 3 = 7) the detection rate was 18 % for both, FBC and SBC (p = 0.9). Six hundred and eighty-seven SBC (89 %) showed no histologic difference. On the lesion level, 40 SBC detected PCa with negative FBC (7.5 %). Twenty SBC showed a Gleason upgrade from 3 + 3 = 6 to ≥3 + 4 = 7 (2.6 %) and 4 to ≥4 + 3 = 7 (0.5 %).
conclusionThe benefit of a second targeted biopsy core per suspicious MRI-lesion is likely minor, especially regarding PCa detection rate and significant Gleason upgrading. Therefore, a further reduction of biopsy cores is reasonable when performing a targeted MR-guided in-bore prostate biopsy. KEY POINTS: • Higher PI-RADS overall score (IV-V) correlated well with PCa detection rate • In more than 80 % SBC was concordant regarding overall PCa detection • In almost 90 % there was no Gleason upgrading by the SBC • Only 2/54 (3.7 %) csPCa was missed when the SBC was omitted • For IB-GB a further reduction of biopsy cores is reasonable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26920391What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.