ArticleBMC plant biology2016
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicis-lycopersici induces distinct transcriptome reprogramming in resistant and susceptible isogenic tomato lines.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcriptomic Differences Between TwoJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Intraspecific Grafting of Tomatoes: Impact of Disease-Resistant Rootstocks on Fusarium Wilt Prevention, Plant Growth, and Fruit Quality under Naturally Infested Field Conditions.The plant pathology journal · 2025Article
- Characterisation ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Network analyses predict major regulators of resistance to early blight disease complex in tomato.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Genomic insights and biocontrol potential of ten bacterial strains from the tomato core microbiome.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Genome-wide linkage mapping of Fusarium crown rot in common wheat (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Comprehensive transcriptome analyses of3 Biotech · 2023Article
- Tissues and mechanisms associated with Verticillium wilt resistance in tomato using bi-grafted near-isogenic lines.Journal of experimental botany · 2023Article
- Article
- Broad-spectrum chemicals block ROS detoxification to prevent plant fungal invasion.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- Overexpression of Lectin Receptor-Like Kinase 1 in Tomato Confers Resistance toFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Transcriptional responses to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Sacc.) Snyder & Hansen infection in three Colombian tomato cultivars.BMC plant biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Salicylic acid and nitric oxide cross-talks to improve innate immunity and plant vigor in tomato against Fusarium oxysporum stress.Plant cell reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Overexpression of bacterialGM crops & food · 2021Article
- Transcriptome Analysis of Resistance to Fusarium Wilt in Mung Bean (Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Integrative Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Analyses of Pattern- and Effector-Triggered Immunity in Tomato.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Combining transcriptome analysis and GWAS for identification and validation of marker genes in thePeerJ · 2021Article
- Interaction between Bean andPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicis-lycopersici (FORL) is one of the most destructive necrotrophic pathogens affecting tomato crops, causing considerable field and greenhouse yield losses. Despite such major economic impact, little is known about the molecular mechanisms regulating Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicis-lycopersici resistance in tomato.
resultsA transcriptomic experiment was carried out in order to investigate the main mechanisms of FORL response in resistant and susceptible isogenic tomato lines. Microarray analysis at 15 DPI (days post inoculum) revealed a distinct gene expression pattern between the two genotypes in the inoculated vs non-inoculated conditions. A model of plant response both for compatible and incompatible reactions was proposed. In particular, in the incompatible interaction an activation of defense genes related to secondary metabolite production and tryptophan metabolism was observed. Moreover, maintenance of the cell osmotic potential after the FORL challenging was mediated by a dehydration-induced protein. As for the compatible interaction, activation of an oxidative burst mediated by peroxidases and a cytochrome monooxygenase induced cell degeneration and necrosis.
conclusionsOur work allowed comprehensive understanding of the molecular basis of the tomato-FORL interaction. The result obtained emphasizes a different transcriptional reaction between the resistant and the susceptible genotype to the FORL challenge. Our findings could lead to the improvement in disease control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.