Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26919838›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2016

Student self-reported communication skills, knowledge and confidence across standardised patient, virtual and traditional clinical learning environments.

Michelle Quail, Shelley B Brundage, Josh Spitalnick, Peter J Allen, Janet Beilby

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05685459 (Position and Communication Skills Simulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05685459 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Position and Communication Skills Simulation: Comparison of Two Simulation Models in Nursing Student

TypeinterventionalSponsorSakarya UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsComparing to Effect Two Simulation ModelsArmsStandard patient simulation model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Student perspectives of simulated learning to improve their dysphagia management.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Using Simulations to Help Public Health Students Overcome Language Barriers for Better Health Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle QuailCurtin University, School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia. m.quail@curtin.edu.au.
Shelley B BrundageGeorge Washington University, Washington, USA. brundage@gwu.edu.
Josh SpitalnickCitrine Technologies, Atlanta, USA. josh@citrinetechnologies.com.
Peter J AllenCurtin University, School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia. p.allen@curtin.edu.au.
Janet BeilbyCurtin University, School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia. j.beilby@curtin.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvanced communication skills are vital for allied health professionals, yet students often have limited opportunities in which to develop them. The option of increasing clinical placement hours is unsustainable in a climate of constrained budgets, limited placement availability and increasing student numbers. Consequently, many educators are considering the potentials of alternative training methods, such as simulation. Simulations provide safe, repeatable and standardised learning environments in which students can practice a variety of clinical skills. This study investigated students' self-rated communication skill, knowledge, confidence and empathy across simulated and traditional learning environments.

methodUndergraduate speech pathology students were randomly allocated to one of three communication partners with whom they engaged conversationally for up to 30 min: a patient in a nursing home (n = 21); an elderly trained patient actor (n = 22); or a virtual patient (n = 19). One week prior to, and again following the conversational interaction, participants completed measures of self-reported communication skill, knowledge and confidence (developed by the authors based on the Four Habit Coding Scheme), as well as the Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Health Professionals (student version).

resultsAll three groups reported significantly higher communication knowledge, skills and confidence post-placement (Median d = .58), while the degree of change did not vary as a function of group membership (Median η (2)  < .01). In addition, only students interacting with a nursing home resident reported higher empathy after the placement. Students reported that conversing with the virtual patient was more challenging than conversing with a nursing home patient or actor, and students appeared to derive the same benefit from the experience.

conclusionsParticipants self-reported higher communication skill, knowledge and confidence, though not empathy, following a brief placement in a virtual, standardised or traditional learning environment. The self-reported increases were consistent across the three placement types. It is proposed that the findings from this study provide support for the integration of more sustainable, standardised, virtual patient-based placement models into allied health training programs for the training of communication skills.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCommunicationPatient SimulationEducational MeasurementEducation, MedicalEmpathyFemaleHumansMalePhysician-Patient RelationsSelf ReportStudents, MedicalUser-Computer InterfaceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26919838
PMCPMC4769506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.