Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26919709›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Identification of Adjuvantic Activity of Amphotericin B in a Novel, Multiplexed, Poly-TLR/NLR High-Throughput Screen.

Alex C D Salyer, Giuseppe Caruso, Karishma K Khetani, Lauren M Fox, Subbalakshmi S Malladi, Sunil A David

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Emerging concepts in the science of vaccine adjuvants.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alex C D SalyerDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Giuseppe CarusoDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Karishma K KhetaniDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Lauren M FoxDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Subbalakshmi S MalladiDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Sunil A DavidDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
University of Kansas · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small-molecule agonists have been identified for TLR7, TLR8, TLR4 and TLR2 thus far, and chemotypes other than those of canonical ligands are yet to be explored for a number of innate immune receptors. The discovery of novel immunostimulatory molecules would enhance the repertoire of tools available for interrogating innate immune effector mechanisms, and provide additional venues for vaccine adjuvant development. A multiplexed, reporter gene-based high-throughput assay capable of detecting agonists of TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, TLR5, TLR7, TLR8, TLR9, NOD1 and NOD2 was utilized in screening 123,943 compounds, in which amphotericin B (AmpB) and nystatin were identified as prominent hits. The polyene antifungal agents act as TLR2- and TLR4-agonists. The TLR4-stimulatory activity of AmpB was similar to that of monophosphoryl lipid A, suggestive of TRIF-biased signaling. The adjuvantic activity of AmpB, at a dose of 100 micrograms, was comparable to several other candidate adjuvants in rabbit models of immunization. These results point to its potential applicability as a safe and effective adjuvant for human vaccines.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAmphotericin BCell LineHumansNystatinReceptors, ImmunologicToll-Like ReceptorsVaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAmphotericin BNystatinReceptors, ImmunologicToll-Like ReceptorsVaccines

Identifiers

PMID26919709
PMCPMC4769227
OpenAlexW2276745701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.