Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26919540›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

New Pseudomonas spp. Are Pathogenic to Citrus.

Farid Beiki, Antonio Busquets, Margarita Gomila, Heshmat Rahimian, Jorge Lalucat, Elena García-Valdés

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  8. Uncommonly isolated clinical Pseudomonas: identification and phylogenetic assignation.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Clarification of Taxonomic Status within theFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Farid BeikiIranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran.
Antonio BusquetsDepartment of Biology-Microbiology, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Crtra. Valldemossa km 7.5, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Margarita GomilaDepartment of Biology-Microbiology, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Crtra. Valldemossa km 7.5, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Heshmat RahimianAgricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University Sari, Māzandarān, Iran, Department of Plant Protection, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, P.O. BOX 578, Mazandaran, SaSari, Iran.
Jorge LalucatDepartment of Biology-Microbiology, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Crtra. Valldemossa km 7.5, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Elena García-ValdésDepartment of Biology-Microbiology, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Crtra. Valldemossa km 7.5, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Five putative novel Pseudomonas species shown to be pathogenic to citrus have been characterized in a screening of 126 Pseudomonas strains isolated from diseased citrus leaves and stems in northern Iran. The 126 strains were studied using a polyphasic approach that included phenotypic characterizations and phylogenetic multilocus sequence analysis. The pathogenicity of these strains against 3 cultivars of citrus is demonstrated in greenhouse and field studies. The strains were initially grouped phenotypically and by their partial rpoD gene sequences into 11 coherent groups in the Pseudomonas fluorescens phylogenetic lineage. Fifty-three strains that are representatives of the 11 groups were selected and analyzed by partial sequencing of their 16S rRNA and gyrB genes. The individual and concatenated partial sequences of the three genes were used to construct the corresponding phylogenetic trees. The majority of the strains were identified at the species level: P. lurida (5 strains), P. monteilii (2 strains), P. moraviensis (1 strain), P. orientalis (16 strains), P. simiae (7 strains), P. syringae (46 strains, distributed phylogenetically in at least 5 pathovars), and P. viridiflava (2 strains). This is the first report of pathogenicity on citrus of P. orientalis, P. simiae, P. lurida, P. moraviensis and P. monteilii strains. The remaining 47 strains that could not be identified at the species level are considered representatives of at least 5 putative novel Pseudomonas species that are not yet described.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCitrusGenes, BacterialIranMultilocus Sequence TypingPhylogenyPlant DiseasesPseudomonasSigma FactorSpecies SpecificityVirulenceBacterial ProteinsSigma Factor

Identifiers

PMID26919540
PMCPMC4769151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.