Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26919465›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Antibiotic Self-Prescribing Trends, Experiences and Attitudes in Upper Respiratory Tract Infection among Pharmacy and Non-Pharmacy Students: A Study from Lahore.

Zikria Saleem, Hamid Saeed, Mobasher Ahmad, Mahrukh Yousaf, Hafsa Binte Hassan, Ayesha Javed, Nida Anees, Sonu Maharjan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Knowledge, attitude, and perception of community pharmacists towards antimicrobial stewardship in Saudi Arabia: A descriptive cross-sectional study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zikria SaleemClinical Pharmacy Section, University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, AllamaIqbal Campus, 54000, Lahore, Pakistan.
Hamid SaeedClinical Pharmacy Section, University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, AllamaIqbal Campus, 54000, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mobasher AhmadClinical Pharmacy Section, University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, AllamaIqbal Campus, 54000, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mahrukh YousafClinical Pharmacy Section, University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, AllamaIqbal Campus, 54000, Lahore, Pakistan.
Hafsa Binte HassanClinical Pharmacy Section, University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, AllamaIqbal Campus, 54000, Lahore, Pakistan.
Ayesha JavedClinical Pharmacy Section, University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, AllamaIqbal Campus, 54000, Lahore, Pakistan.
Nida AneesClinical Pharmacy Section, University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, AllamaIqbal Campus, 54000, Lahore, Pakistan.
Sonu MaharjanClinical Pharmacy Section, University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, AllamaIqbal Campus, 54000, Lahore, Pakistan.
University of the Punjab · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacists are the custodians of drugs; hence their education, training, behaviors and experiences would affect the future use of drugs at community and hospital pharmacies. Therefore, we aimed at evaluating the self-prescribing antibiotic trends, knowledge and attitudes among pharmacy and non-pharmacy students. We found that pharmacy students had higher risks of experiencing URIs related symptoms such as cough (RR; 1.7, p = 0.002), allergy (RR; 2.07, p = 0.03) and running nose (RR; 3.17, p<0.005), compared to non-pharmacy students -resulting in higher probabilities of selecting cough syrups (OR; 2.3, p<0.005), anti-histamines (OR; 1.8, p = 0.036) and anti-inflammatory/anti-pyretic (OR; 2.4, p<0.005) drugs. Likewise, bachelor's degree pupils (OR; 2, p = 0.045), urban area residents (OR; 2.44; p = 0.002) and pharmacy students (OR; 2.9, p<0.005) exhibited higher propensities of antibiotic self-use-notable classes include, b-lactams (45.9%) followed by macrolides (26.5%) and augmentin (28.94%), respectively. Surprisingly, pharmacy and non-pharmacy students had higher odds of using antibiotics in common cold (OR; 3.2, p<0.005) and pain (OR; 2.37, p = 0.015), respectively. Unlike non-pharmacy students, pharmacy students were likely to select alternative therapy, such as Joshanda (OR; 2.22, p = 0.011) and were well acquainted with antibiotic hazards, with 77% reduction in risk of antibiotics re-use. In conclusion, university students exhibited antibiotic self-prescribing trends in conditions that does not warrant their use, thus are irrational users. The pharmacy education confers very little benefit to rational self-prescribing practices among students, while non-pharmacy students are more vulnerable to repeated antibiotic usage. Thus, the educational and training modules should be designed for university students to disseminate targeted information regarding the potential hazards of antibiotic self-use and importance of consultation with qualified and registered medical doctor/pharmacist before starting with antibiotics.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDrug PrescriptionsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeStudents, PharmacyAdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsEducation, PharmacyFemaleHumansMalePakistanRespiratory Tract InfectionsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26919465
PMCPMC4769098
OpenAlexW2280597124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.