Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26919320›Full record

ArticleBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2017

Molecular Diagnostics of Gliomas Using Next Generation Sequencing of a Glioma-Tailored Gene Panel.

Angela Zacher, Kerstin Kaulich, Stefanie Stepanow, Marietta Wolter, Karl Köhrer, Jörg Felsberg, Bastian Malzkorn, Guido Reifenberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Molecular Biomarker Testing for the Diagnosis of Diffuse Gliomas.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ultra-Fast IntraoperativeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Complex Diagnostic Challenges in Glioblastoma: The Role ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Angela ZacherDepartment of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Kerstin KaulichDepartment of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Stefanie StepanowBiological and Medical Research Center (BMFZ), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Marietta WolterDepartment of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Karl KöhrerBiological and Medical Research Center (BMFZ), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jörg FelsbergDepartment of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Bastian MalzkornDepartment of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Guido ReifenbergerDepartment of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current classification of gliomas is based on histological criteria according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the central nervous system. Over the past years, characteristic genetic profiles have been identified in various glioma types. These can refine tumor diagnostics and provide important prognostic and predictive information. We report on the establishment and validation of gene panel next generation sequencing (NGS) for the molecular diagnostics of gliomas. We designed a glioma-tailored gene panel covering 660 amplicons derived from 20 genes frequently aberrant in different glioma types. Sensitivity and specificity of glioma gene panel NGS for detection of DNA sequence variants and copy number changes were validated by single gene analyses. NGS-based mutation detection was optimized for application on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens including small stereotactic biopsy samples. NGS data obtained in a retrospective analysis of 121 gliomas allowed for their molecular classification into distinct biological groups, including (i) isocitrate dehydrogenase gene (IDH) 1 or 2 mutant astrocytic gliomas with frequent α-thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX) and tumor protein p53 (TP53) gene mutations, (ii) IDH mutant oligodendroglial tumors with 1p/19q codeletion, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation and frequent Drosophila homolog of capicua (CIC) gene mutation, as well as (iii) IDH wildtype glioblastomas with frequent TERT promoter mutation, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) mutation and/or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification. Oligoastrocytic gliomas were genetically assigned to either of these groups. Our findings implicate gene panel NGS as a promising diagnostic technique that may facilitate integrated histological and molecular glioma classification.

Indexed as

alpha-ThalassemiaAstrocytomaBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsGenes, p53Genetic TestingGliomaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationPathology, MolecularPrognosisPromoter Regions, GeneticRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorIsocitrate Dehydrogenasegliomamolecular diagnosticsmutationnext generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID26919320
PMCPMC8029406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.