ReviewThe European journal of neuroscience2016
Neuronal central nervous system syndromes probably mediated by autoantibodies.
Review in The European journal of neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Seronegative Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Case Report and Literature Review on Psychiatric Presentations.Case reports in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Case Report: Clinical features and management of anti-mGluR1 encephalitis: case illustration and review of the literature.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2025Article
- Cerebrospinal fluid YKL-40 level evolution is associated with autoimmune encephalitis remission.Clinical & translational immunology · 2023Article
- Immunity, Ion Channels and Epilepsy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- A Retrospective Study of Patients with GABANeuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2021Article
- Short- and Long-Lived Autoantibody-Secreting Cells in Autoimmune Neurological Disorders.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Associations between HLA and autoimmune neurological diseases with autoantibodies.Auto- immunity highlights · 2020Review
- Pathophysiology of paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis: genes, infections, and checkpoint inhibitors.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2020Review
- Two Cases of Late-Onset Anti-NMDAr Auto-Immune Encephalitis After Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Encephalitis.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Encephalitis, Mild Encephalitis, Neuroprogression, or Encephalopathy-Not Merely a Question of Terminology.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2018Article
- Impaired Glycine Receptor Trafficking in Neurological Diseases.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018Review
- Treatment strategies for autoimmune encephalitis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2018Review
- Autoimmune encephalitis in psychiatric institutions: current perspectives.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In the last few years, a rapidly growing number of autoantibodies targeting neuronal cell-surface antigens have been identified in patients presenting with neurological symptoms. Targeted antigens include ionotropic receptors such as N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor or the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor, metabotropic receptors such as mGluR1 and mGluR5, and other synaptic proteins, some of them belonging to the voltage-gated potassium channel complex. Importantly, the cell-surface location of these antigens makes them vulnerable to direct antibody-mediated modulation. Some of these autoantibodies, generally targeting ionotropic channels or their partner proteins, define clinical syndromes resembling models of pharmacological or genetic disruption of the corresponding antigen, suggesting a direct pathogenic role of the associated autoantibodies. Moreover, the associated neurological symptoms are usually immunotherapy-responsive, further arguing for a pathogenic effect of the antibodies. Some studies have shown that some patients' antibodies may have structural and functional in vitro effects on the targeted antigens. Definite proof of the pathogenicity of these autoantibodies has been obtained for just a few through passive transfer experiments in animal models. In this review we present existing and converging evidence suggesting a pathogenic role of some autoantibodies directed against neuronal cell-surface antigens observed in patients with central nervous system disorders. We describe the main clinical symptoms characterizing the patients and discuss conflicting arguments regarding the pathogenicity of these antibodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.