Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26918562›Full record

Trial reportHead & neck2016

Phase II study of erlotinib and docetaxel with concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Min Yao, Charles Woods, Pierre Lavertu, Pingfu Fu, Michael Gibson, Rod Rezaee, Chad Zender, Jay Wasman, Neelesh Sharma, Mitchell Machtay and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Head & neck, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Min YaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio.
Charles WoodsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio.
Pierre LavertuDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio.
Pingfu FuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Michael GibsonDepartment of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio.
Rod RezaeeDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio.
Chad ZenderDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jay WasmanDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio.
Neelesh SharmaDepartment of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio.
Mitchell MachtayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio.
Panayiotis SavvidesDepartment of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio.
University Hospitals Case Medical Center · USUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center · USUniversity School · US

Funding

TUMOR METABOLISM PROGRAMP30CA043703 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Amar Desai · 1987 to 2026
$142.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA043703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to establish the efficacy and toxicities of concurrent erlotinib and docetaxel with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

methodsPatients received daily erlotinib for 2 weeks, followed by daily IMRT with concurrent weekly docetaxel and daily erlotinib, followed by daily erlotinib for up to 2 years. The primary objective was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), patterns of failure, and toxicities. Forty-three patients were recruited for this study.

resultsWith a median follow-up of 48.7 months, the 3-year DFS, OS, locoregional failure-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival was 69.5%, 81%, 82.4%, and 83.7%, respectively. The most common grade III/IV local toxicities were dysphagia, dermatitis, and mucositis. Patients with p16-positive tumors had significantly better outcomes.

conclusionThe regimen is tolerable and effective. It is worthy of further investigation in selected patients and may be useful in patients who cannot tolerate cisplatin. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1770-E1776, 2016.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCisplatinDisease-Free SurvivalDocetaxelErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedTaxoidsCisplatinDocetaxelErlotinib HydrochlorideTaxoidschemoradiationdocetaxelerlotinibhead and neck cancerradiation

Identifiers

PMID26918562
PMCPMC4844765
OpenAlexW2274820688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.