ArticleBreastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine2016
Infant-Feeding Intentions and Practices of Internal Medicine Physicians.
Article in Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Returning to clinical work and doctors' personal, social and organisational needs: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- Experiences of breast feeding at work for physicians, residents and medical students: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Physician Mothers and Breastfeeding: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2020Article
- Enabling Nursing Students to Achieve Their Breastfeeding Goals.Clinical lactation (Amarillo, Tex.) · 2020Article
- Parenting and female dermatologists' perceptions of work-life balance.International journal of women's dermatology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPersonal breastfeeding behavior of physician mothers is associated with their clinical breastfeeding advocacy, which in turn impacts patients' breastfeeding behavior. Internists can play an important role in breastfeeding advocacy as they usually come in contact with mothers longitudinally.
objectiveTo explore the personal infant-feeding decisions and behavior of physician mothers in internal medicine (IM). MATERIALS AND
methodsPhysicians with current or previous IM training were isolated from our "Breastfeeding Among Physicians" database. The data in the database were gathered from cross-sectional surveys of 130 physician volunteers, mainly affiliated with the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (Baltimore, MD) and the University of Florida College of Medicine (Gainesville, FL).
resultsSeventy-two mothers reported current or previous IM training and had 196 infants. Breastfeeding rates were 96% at birth, 77% at 6 months, and 40% at 12 months. Exclusive breastfeeding rates were 78% at birth, 67% at 3 months, and 30% at 6 months. While maternal goal for breastfeeding duration correlated with duration of both exclusive and any breastfeeding, there was a consistent and appreciable disparity between maternal duration goal and actual breastfeeding duration. The participants reported work-related reasons for early supplementation and breastfeeding cessation.
conclusionsWe have described for the first time in the literature the personal infant-feeding intentions and behavior of a cohort of IM physician mothers. Workplace interventions to enable internists to maintain breastfeeding after return to work and to achieve their breastfeeding goals might improve the health of these mothers and their infants and positively impact their clinical breastfeeding advocacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.