Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26918330›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii and Mode of Delivery on the Early Development of the Gut Microbial Community in Preterm Infants.

Natalia Zeber-Lubecka, Maria Kulecka, Filip Ambrozkiewicz, Agnieszka Paziewska, Milosz Lechowicz, Ewa Konopka, Urszula Majewska, Maria Borszewska-Kornacka, Michal Mikula, Bozena Cukrowska and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Methods for exploring the faecal microbiome of premature infants: a review.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Bacterial Baptism: Scientific, Medical, and Regulatory Issues Raised by Vaginal Seeding of C-Section-Born Babies.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Natalia Zeber-LubeckaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Maria KuleckaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Filip AmbrozkiewiczDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka PaziewskaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Milosz LechowiczNeonatal and Intensive Care Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Ewa KonopkaDepartment of Pathology, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Urszula MajewskaNeonatal and Intensive Care Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Maria Borszewska-KornackaNeonatal and Intensive Care Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Michal MikulaDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Bozena CukrowskaDepartment of Pathology, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Jerzy OstrowskiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLChildren's Memorial Health Institute · PLThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in culture-independent approaches have enabled insights into the diversity, complexity, and individual variability of gut microbial communities.

objectivesTo examine the effect of oral administration of Saccharomyces (S.) boulardii and mode of delivery on the intestinal microbial community in preterm infants. STUDY

designStool samples were collected from preterm newborns randomly divided into two groups: a probiotic-receiving group (n = 18) or a placebo group (n = 21). Samples were collected before probiotic intake (day 0), and after 2 and 6 weeks of supplementation. The composition of colonizing bacteria was assessed by 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing of fecal samples using the Ion 16S Metagenomics Kit and the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine platform.

resultsA total of 11932257 reads were generated, and were clustered into 459, 187, and 176 operational taxonomic units at 0 days, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks, respectively. Of the 17 identified phyla, Firmicutes Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes were universal. The microbial community differed at day 0 compared with at 2 weeks and 6 weeks. There was a tendency for increased bacterial diversity at 2 weeks and 6 weeks compared with day 0, and infants with a gestational age of 31 weeks or higher presented increased bacterial diversity prior to S. boulardii administration. Firmicutes and Proteobacteria remained stable during the observation period, whereas Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes increased in abundance, the latter particularly more sharply in vaginally delivered infants.

conclusionWhile the mode of delivery may influence the development of a microbial community, this study had not enough power to detect statistical differences between cohorts supplemented with probiotics, and in a consequence, to speculate on S. boulardii effect on gut microbiome composition in preterm newborns.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricGastrointestinal MicrobiomeInfant, PrematureProbioticsSaccharomycesAdministration, OralBacteriaDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalDouble-Blind MethodFecesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMetagenomeDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalReagent Kits, DiagnosticRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26918330
PMCPMC4769247
OpenAlexW2286104098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.