Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26918156›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2015

Capturing relevant extracellular matrices for investigating cell migration.

Patricia Keely, Amrinder Nain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mitotic outcomes and errors in fibrous environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Sculpting Rupture-Free Nuclear Shapes in Fibrous Environments.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bioenergetics underlying single-cell migration on aligned nanofiber scaffolds.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patricia KeelyDepartment of Cell and Regenerative Biology, UW Carbone Cancer Center, UW School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Amrinder Nain2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much progress in understanding cell migration has been determined by using classic two-dimensional (2D) tissue culture platforms. However, increasingly, it is appreciated that certain properties of cell migration in vivo are not represented by strictly 2D assays. There is much interest in creating relevant three-dimensional (3D) culture environments and engineered platforms to better represent features of the extracellular matrix and stromal microenvironment that are not captured in 2D platforms. Important to this goal is a solid understanding of the features of the extracellular matrix-composition, stiffness, topography, and alignment-in different tissues and disease states and the development of means to capture these features.

Indexed as

cell migrationECMextracellular matrixMatrix remodelingstromal microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID26918156
PMCPMC4754037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.