Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26918134›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2015

Transversus abdominal plane (TAP) block for postoperative pain management: a review.

Jan Jakobsson, Liselott Wickerts, Sune Forsberg, Gustaf Ledin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07077863 (Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Applied by the Surgeon or Anaesthetist for Postoperative Pain Management in Gynaecological Cancer Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07077863 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Applied by the Surgeon or Anaesthetist for Postoperative Pain Management in Gynaecological Cancer Surgery: a Retrospective Review

TypeobservationalSponsorDuygu AkyolRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsPeripheral Blocs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Ultrasound a Game Changer.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2017
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jan JakobssonDepartment of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Institution for Clinical Science, Karolinska Institute at Danderyds and Norrtälje Hospitals, Stockholm, Sweden.
Liselott WickertsDepartment of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Institution for Clinical Science, Karolinska Institute at Danderyds and Norrtälje Hospitals, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sune ForsbergDepartment of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Institution for Clinical Science, Karolinska Institute at Danderyds and Norrtälje Hospitals, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gustaf LedinDepartment of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Institution for Clinical Science, Karolinska Institute at Danderyds and Norrtälje Hospitals, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transversus abdominal plane (TAP) block has a long history and there is currently extensive clinical experience around TAP blocks. The aim of this review is to provide a summary of the present evidence on the effects of TAP block and to provide suggestions for further studies. There are several approaches to performing abdominal wall blocks, with the rapid implementation of ultrasound-guided technique facilitating a major difference in TAP block performance. During surgery, an abdominal wall block may also be applied by the surgeon from inside the abdominal cavity. Today, there are more than 11 meta-analyses providing a compiled evidence base around the effects of TAP block. These analyses include different procedures, different techniques of TAP block administration and, importantly, they compare the TAP block with a variety of alternative analgesic regimes. The effects of TAP block during laparoscopic cholecystectomy seem to be equivalent to local infiltration analgesia and also seem to be beneficial during laparoscopic colon resection. The effects of TAP are more pronounced when it is provided prior to surgery and these effects are local anaesthesia dose-dependent. TAP block seems an interesting alternative in patients with, for example, severe obesity where epidural or spinal anaesthesia/analgesia is technically difficult and/or poses a risk. There is an obvious need for further high-quality studies comparing TAP block prior to surgery with local infiltration analgesia, single-shot spinal analgesia, and epidural analgesia. These studies should be procedure-specific and the effects should be evaluated, both regarding short-term pain and analgesic requirement and also including the effects on postoperative nausea and vomiting, recovery of bowel function, ambulation, discharge, and protracted recovery outcomes (assessed by e.g., postoperative quality of recovery scale).

Indexed as

pain managmentTAP-blockTransversus abdominal-plane blockultra-sound

Identifiers

PMID26918134
PMCPMC4754005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.