Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26918128›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2015

Sharing the sandbox: Evolutionary mechanisms that maintain bacterial cooperation.

Eric Bruger, Christopher Waters

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. A systematic approach to cancer: evolution beyond selection.Clinical and translational medicine · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. mBio · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eric BrugerDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics and the BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Christopher WatersDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics and the BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.

Funding

Molecular mechanisms of adaptive diversity in Burkholderia biofilmsR01GM110444 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COOPER, VAUGHN · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbes are now known to participate in an extensive repertoire of cooperative behaviors such as biofilm formation, production of extracellular public-goods, group motility, and higher-ordered multicellular structures. A fundamental question is how these cooperative tasks are maintained in the face of non-cooperating defector cells. Recently, a number of molecular mechanisms including facultative participation, spatial sorting, and policing have been discovered to stabilize cooperation. Often these different mechanisms work in concert to reinforce cooperation. In this review, we describe bacterial cooperation and the current understanding of the molecular mechanisms that maintain it.

Indexed as

bacterial cooperationbiofilmmicrobes

Identifiers

PMID26918128
PMCPMC4753998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.