Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26917949›Full record

ArticleIntegrative medicine insights2016

Comparison of a Medication Inventory and a Dietary Supplement Interview in Assessing Dietary Supplement Use in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.

Keturah R Faurot, Anna Maria Siega-Riz, Paula Gardiner, José O Rivera, Laura A Young, Charles Poole, Eric A Whitsel, Hector M González, Diana A Chirinos-Medina, Gregory A Talavera and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative medicine insights, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Keturah R FaurotDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.; Program on Integrative Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Anna Maria Siega-RizDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Paula GardinerDepartment of Family Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
José O RiveraCooperative Pharmacy Program, University of Texas at Austin/El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA.
Laura A YoungDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Charles PooleDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Eric A WhitselDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Hector M GonzálezDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lancing, MI, USA.
Diana A Chirinos-MedinaDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Gregory A TalaveraDivision of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sheila F CastañedaDivision of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Martha L DaviglusFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.; Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Janice BarnhartDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Rebeca E GiacintoDivision of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Linda Van HornFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Tumor Environment and Metastasis (TEAM) Research ProgramP30CA060553 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Daniela E Matei · 1993 to 2026
$153.9M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
UNC Research Fellowship in Complementary and Alternative MedicineT32AT003378 · NCCIH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Keturah Ruth Faurot, Susan Gaylord · 2007 to 2026
$7.8M
Thalassemia Clinical Research Network, CanadaU01HL065233 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK · PI OLIVIERI, NANCY F · 2000 to 2009
$2.6M
GENETIC ARCHITECTURE OF PLASMA T-PA AND PAI-1R01HL065234 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, JASON H. · 2000 to 2004
$1.7M
HISPANIC COMMUNITY HEALTH STUDY-268065233N01HC065233 · HC · COORDINATING CENTER · PI CHAMBLESS, LLOYD E · 2006 to 2006
–
NCCIH NIH HHS T32 AT003378NCI NIH HHS P30 CA060553NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC065233NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC065234NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC065235NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC065236NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC065237NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although dietary supplement use is common, its assessment is challenging, especially among ethnic minority populations such as Hispanics/Latinos. Using the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) (n = 16,415), this report compares two strategies for capturing dietary supplement use over a 30-day period: a medication-based inventory and a nutrition-based dietary supplement interview. Age-standardized prevalence was calculated across multiple dietary supplement definitions, adjusted with survey/nonresponse weights. The prevalence of dietary supplement use was substantially higher as measured in the dietary supplement interview, compared to the medication inventory: for total dietary supplements (39% vs 26%, respectively), for nonvitamin, nonmineral supplements (24% vs 12%), and for botanicals (9.2% vs 4.5%). Concordance between the two assessments was fair to moderate (Cohen's kappa: 0.31-0.52). Among women, inclusion of botanical teas increased the prevalence of botanical supplement use from 7% to 15%. Supplement assessment that includes queries about botanical teas yields more information about patient supplement use.

Indexed as

dietary supplementsepidemiologyHispanics/Latinosmeasurement methodology

Identifiers

PMID26917949
PMCPMC4756859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.