Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26917656›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2016

Overdiagnosis of asthma in children in primary care: a retrospective analysis.

Ingrid Looijmans-van den Akker, Karen van Luijn, Theo Verheij

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Asthma in African children and adolescents: Burden, barriers, and management strategies.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Prognostic utility of pre-biologic treatment correlates of childhood severe asthma exacerbation risk: Real world evidence.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ingrid Looijmans-van den AkkerLeidsche Rijn Julius Health Care Centers, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Karen van LuijnLeidsche Rijn Julius Health Care Centers, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Theo VerheijProfessor of general practice and GP, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Leidsche Rijn Julius Health Centers · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsthma is one of the most common chronic diseases in childhood. According to guidelines, a diagnosis of asthma should be confirmed using lung function testing in children aged >6 years. Previous studies indicate that asthma in children is probably overdiagnosed. However, the extent has not previously been assessed.

aimTo assess the extent and characteristics of confirmed and unconfirmed diagnoses of asthma in children who were diagnosed by their GP as having asthma or who were treated as having asthma. DESIGN AND

settingRetrospective analysis in four academic primary healthcare centres in Utrecht, the Netherlands.

methodRoutine care registration data of children aged 6-18 years who received a diagnosis of asthma or were treated as having asthma were analysed.

resultsIn only 16.1% (n = 105) of the children diagnosed with asthma was the diagnosis confirmed with spirometry, whereas in 23.2% (n = 151) the signs and symptoms did give rise to suspected asthma but the children should have undergone further lung function tests. In more one-half (53.5%, n = 349) of the children the signs and symptoms made asthma unlikely and thus they were most likely overdiagnosed. The remaining 7.2% (n = 47) were probably correctly classified as not having asthma. The main reasons for classifying asthma without children undergoing further lung function tests were dyspnoea (31.9%, n = 174), cough (26.0%, n = 142), and wheezing (10.4%, n = 57).

conclusionOverdiagnosis of childhood asthma is common in primary care, leading to unnecessary treatment, disease burden, and impact on quality of life. However, only in a small percentage of children is a diagnosis of asthma confirmed by lung function tests.

Indexed as

Medical OverusePractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality of LifeRespiratory Function TestsRespiratory SoundsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Asthmatic Agentsasthmachildrendiagnosisguidelinesrespiratory function testsspirometry

Identifiers

PMID26917656
PMCPMC4758494
OpenAlexW2289260229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.