Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26917566›Full record

Trial reportStroke2016

Association Between Time From Stroke Onset and Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Lesion Intensity Is Modified by Status of Collateral Circulation.

Anke Wouters, Patrick Dupont, Soren Christensen, Bo Norrving, Rico Laage, Götz Thomalla, Greg Albers, Vincent Thijs, Robin Lemmens

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stroke, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Relationships between brain perfusion and early recanalization after intravenous thrombolysis for acute stroke with large vessel occlusion.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Time-Dependent Endovascular Treatment Effect According to Collateral Status in Basilar Artery Occlusion.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A Comparison of TJournal of central nervous system disease · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anke WoutersFrom the Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology and Leuven Research Institute for Neuroscience and Disease (LIND), KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory of Neurobiology, VIB, Vesalius Research Center, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (P.D.); Department of Neurology, Stroke Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (S.C., G.A.); Section of Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (B.N.); Guided Development GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany (R.L.); Uinversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopf-und Neurozentrum, Hamburg, Germany (G.T.); and Department of Neurology Austin Health, Melbourne Brain Center, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia (V.T.). anke.wouters@med.kuleuven.be.
Patrick DupontFrom the Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology and Leuven Research Institute for Neuroscience and Disease (LIND), KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory of Neurobiology, VIB, Vesalius Research Center, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (P.D.); Department of Neurology, Stroke Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (S.C., G.A.); Section of Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (B.N.); Guided Development GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany (R.L.); Uinversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopf-und Neurozentrum, Hamburg, Germany (G.T.); and Department of Neurology Austin Health, Melbourne Brain Center, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia (V.T.).
Soren ChristensenFrom the Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology and Leuven Research Institute for Neuroscience and Disease (LIND), KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory of Neurobiology, VIB, Vesalius Research Center, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (P.D.); Department of Neurology, Stroke Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (S.C., G.A.); Section of Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (B.N.); Guided Development GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany (R.L.); Uinversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopf-und Neurozentrum, Hamburg, Germany (G.T.); and Department of Neurology Austin Health, Melbourne Brain Center, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia (V.T.).
Bo NorrvingFrom the Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology and Leuven Research Institute for Neuroscience and Disease (LIND), KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory of Neurobiology, VIB, Vesalius Research Center, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (P.D.); Department of Neurology, Stroke Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (S.C., G.A.); Section of Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (B.N.); Guided Development GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany (R.L.); Uinversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopf-und Neurozentrum, Hamburg, Germany (G.T.); and Department of Neurology Austin Health, Melbourne Brain Center, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia (V.T.).
Rico LaageFrom the Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology and Leuven Research Institute for Neuroscience and Disease (LIND), KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory of Neurobiology, VIB, Vesalius Research Center, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (P.D.); Department of Neurology, Stroke Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (S.C., G.A.); Section of Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (B.N.); Guided Development GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany (R.L.); Uinversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopf-und Neurozentrum, Hamburg, Germany (G.T.); and Department of Neurology Austin Health, Melbourne Brain Center, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia (V.T.).
Götz ThomallaFrom the Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology and Leuven Research Institute for Neuroscience and Disease (LIND), KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory of Neurobiology, VIB, Vesalius Research Center, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (P.D.); Department of Neurology, Stroke Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (S.C., G.A.); Section of Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (B.N.); Guided Development GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany (R.L.); Uinversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopf-und Neurozentrum, Hamburg, Germany (G.T.); and Department of Neurology Austin Health, Melbourne Brain Center, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia (V.T.).
Greg AlbersFrom the Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology and Leuven Research Institute for Neuroscience and Disease (LIND), KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory of Neurobiology, VIB, Vesalius Research Center, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (P.D.); Department of Neurology, Stroke Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (S.C., G.A.); Section of Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (B.N.); Guided Development GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany (R.L.); Uinversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopf-und Neurozentrum, Hamburg, Germany (G.T.); and Department of Neurology Austin Health, Melbourne Brain Center, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia (V.T.).
Vincent ThijsFrom the Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology and Leuven Research Institute for Neuroscience and Disease (LIND), KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory of Neurobiology, VIB, Vesalius Research Center, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (P.D.); Department of Neurology, Stroke Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (S.C., G.A.); Section of Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (B.N.); Guided Development GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany (R.L.); Uinversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopf-und Neurozentrum, Hamburg, Germany (G.T.); and Department of Neurology Austin Health, Melbourne Brain Center, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia (V.T.).
Robin LemmensFrom the Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology and Leuven Research Institute for Neuroscience and Disease (LIND), KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory of Neurobiology, VIB, Vesalius Research Center, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.W., R.L.); Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (P.D.); Department of Neurology, Stroke Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (S.C., G.A.); Section of Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (B.N.); Guided Development GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany (R.L.); Uinversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopf-und Neurozentrum, Hamburg, Germany (G.T.); and Department of Neurology Austin Health, Melbourne Brain Center, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia (V.T.).

Funding

NEW MRI TECHNIQUES PRIOR TO T-PA THERAPY AFTER STROKER01NS039325 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALBERS, GREGORY W · 2000 to 2010
$4.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIn patients with acute stroke, the intensity of a fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) lesion in the region of diffusion restriction is associated with time from symptom onset. We hypothesized that collateral status as assessed by the hypoperfusion intensity ratio could modify the association between time from stroke onset and FLAIR lesion intensity.

methodsFrom the AX200 for ischemic stroke trial, 141 patients had appropriate FLAIR, diffusion-weighted imaging, and perfusion-weighted imaging. In the region of nonreperfused core, we calculated voxel-based relative FLAIR (rFLAIR) signal intensity. The hypoperfusion intensity ratio was defined as the ratio of the Tmax >10 s lesion over the Tmax >6 s lesion volume. A hypoperfusion intensity ratio threshold of ≤0.4 was used to dichotomize good versus poor collaterals. We studied the interaction between collateral status on the association between time from symptom onset and FLAIR intensity.

resultsTime from symptom onset was associated with the rFLAIR intensity in the region of nonreperfused core (B=1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.1). We identified an interaction between this association and collateral status; an association was present between time and rFLAIR intensity in patients with poor collaterals (r=0.53), but absent in patients with good collaterals (r=0.17; P=0.04).

conclusionsOur findings show that the relationship between time from symptom onset and rFLAIR lesion intensity depends on collateral status. In patients with good collaterals, the development of an rFLAIR-positive lesion is less dependent on time from symptom onset compared with patients with poor collaterals.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBrainBrain IschemiaCollateral CirculationDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsStrokeThrombolytic TherapyTime Factorscollateral circulationmagnetic resonance imagingpathophysiologyperfusion imagingstroke

Identifiers

PMID26917566
PMCPMC4811703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.