Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26917557›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2016

Trans and cis factors affecting A-to-I RNA editing efficiency of a noncoding editing target in C. elegans.

Michael C Washburn, Heather A Hundley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. ADARs mediate distinct RNA editing activity and gene regulation in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael C WashburnDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.
Heather A HundleyMedical Sciences Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

TRAINING IN GENETICST32GM007757 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI KUMAR, JUSTIN P · 1985 to 2014
$8.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing by ADARs affects thousands of adenosines in an organism's transcriptome. However, adenosines are not edited at equal levels nor do these editing levels correlate well with ADAR expression levels. Therefore, additional mechanisms are utilized by the cell to dictate the editing efficiency at a given adenosine. To examine cis-and trans-acting factors that regulate A-to-I editing levels specifically in neural cells, we utilized the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans We demonstrate that a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) binding protein, ADR-1, inhibits editing in neurons, which is largely masked when examining editing levels from whole animals. Furthermore, expression of ADR-1 and mRNA expression of the editing target can act synergistically to regulate editing efficiency. In addition, we identify a dsRNA region within the Y75B8A.83' UTR that acts as acis-regulatory element by enhancing ADR-2 editing efficiency. Together, this work identifies mechanisms that regulate editing efficiency of noncoding A-to-I editing sites, which comprise the largest class of ADAR targets.

Indexed as

RNA Editing3' Untranslated RegionsAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansNucleic Acid ConformationRNA3' Untranslated RegionsRNAADARdouble-stranded RNAneuronsregulation of RNA editingRNA editing

Identifiers

PMID26917557
PMCPMC4836646
OpenAlexW2288113001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.