Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26917235›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2016

COMT Val158Met polymorphism influences the susceptibility to framing in decision-making: OFC-amygdala functional connectivity as a mediator.

Xiaoxue Gao, Pingyuan Gong, Jinting Liu, Jie Hu, Yue Li, Hongbo Yu, Xiaoliang Gong, Yang Xiang, Changjun Jiang, Xiaolin Zhou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Genetics of Risk Aversion: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoxue GaoCenter for Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Pingyuan GongCenter for Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Jinting LiuCenter for Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Jie HuCenter for Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Yue LiCenter for Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Hongbo YuCenter for Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Xiaoliang GongKey Laboratory of Embedded System and Service Computing (Ministry of Education), Tongji University, Shanghai, 201804, China.
Yang XiangKey Laboratory of Embedded System and Service Computing (Ministry of Education), Tongji University, Shanghai, 201804, China.
Changjun JiangKey Laboratory of Embedded System and Service Computing (Ministry of Education), Tongji University, Shanghai, 201804, China.
Xiaolin ZhouCenter for Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Peking University · CNTongji University · CNChinese Institute for Brain Research · CNMinistry of Education · ROShenzhen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals tend to avoid risk in a gain frame, in which options are presented in a positive way, but seek risk in a loss frame, in which the same options are presented negatively. Previous studies suggest that emotional responses play a critical role in this "framing effect." Given that the Met allele of COMT Val158Met polymorphism (rs4680) is associated with the negativity bias during emotional processing, this study investigated whether this polymorphism is associated with individual susceptibility to framing and which brain areas mediate this gene-behavior association. Participants were genotyped, scanned in resting state, and completed a monetary gambling task with options (sure vs risky) presented as potential gains or losses. The Met allele carriers showed a greater framing effect than the Val/Val homozygotes as the former gambled more than the latter in the loss frame. Moreover, the gene-behavior association was mediated by resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) between orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and bilateral amygdala. Met allele carriers showed decreased RSFC, thereby demonstrating higher susceptibility to framing than Val allele carriers. These findings demonstrate the involvement of COMT Val158Met polymorphism in the framing effect in decision-making and suggest RSFC between OFC and amygdala as a neural mediator underlying this gene-behavior association. Hum Brain Mapp 37:1880-1892, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

DeceptionAllelesAmygdalaCatechol O-MethyltransferaseDecision MakingFemaleGames, ExperimentalGenotypeHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMethionineNeural PathwaysPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrefrontal CortexCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCOMT protein, humanMethionineValineamygdalaCOMTframing effectfunctional connectivityorbitofrontal cortexrs4680Val158Met

Identifiers

PMID26917235
PMCPMC6867526
OpenAlexW2278136712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.