Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26916738›Full record

Trial reportAIDS care2016

Conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in Kenya.

Keira Lowther, Richard Harding, Aabid Ahmed, Nancy Gikaara, Zippy Ali, Hellen Kariuki, Lorraine Sherr, Victoria Simms, Lucy Selman

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Keira Lowthera Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation , Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London , London , UK.
Richard Hardinga Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation , Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London , London , UK.
Aabid Ahmedc Bomu Hospital , Mombasa , Kenya.
Nancy Gikaarad Kenyan Hospice and Palliative Care Association , Nairobi , Kenya.
Zippy Alid Kenyan Hospice and Palliative Care Association , Nairobi , Kenya.
Hellen Kariukie Department of Medical Physiology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi , Nairobi , Kenya.
Lorraine Sherrf Institute of Epidemiology & Health, Faculty of Population Health , University College London , London , UK.
Victoria Simmsb Department of infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London , UK.
Lucy Selmana Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation , Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London , London , UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental studies to test interventions for people living with HIV in low- and middle-income countries are essential to ensure appropriate and effective clinical care. The implications of study participation on outcome data in such populations have been discussed theoretically, but rarely empirically examined. We aimed to explore the effects of participating in a randomised controlled trial conducted in an HIV clinic in Mombasa, Kenya. We report qualitative data from the Treatment Outcomes in Palliative Care trial, which evaluated the impact of a nurse-led palliative care intervention for HIV positive adults on antiretroviral therapy compared to standard care. Participants in both arms attended five monthly quantitative data collection appointments. Post-trial exit, 10 control and 20 intervention patients participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews, analysed using thematic analysis. We found benefit attributed to the compassion of the research team, social support, communication, completion of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and material support (transport reimbursement). Being treated with compassion and receiving social support enabled participants to build positive relationships with the research team, which improved mental health and well-being. Open and non-judgmental communication made participants feel accepted. Participants described how repeated completion of the PROMs was a prompt for reflection, through which they began to help themselves and self-care. Participant reimbursements relieved financial hardship and enabled them to fulfil their social responsibilities, enhancing self-worth. These findings emphasise the importance of compassion, support and effective communication in the clinical encounter, particularly in stigmatised and isolated populations, and the potential of the integration of simple PROMs to improve patient outcomes. Participation in research has unexpected positive benefits for participants, which should be taken into account when designing research in similar populations. Researchers should be aware of the effects of financial reimbursement and contact with researchers in isolated and impoverished communities.

Indexed as

Nurse-Patient RelationsPalliative CarePatient Outcome AssessmentSocial IsolationAdultAnti-HIV AgentsCommunicationEmpathyFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansKenyaMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeAnti-HIV AgentsHIVpalliative careParticipation effectsrandomised trialssocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID26916738
PMCPMC4828598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.