Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26916687›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Qualitative critical incident study of patients' experiences leading to emergency hospital admission with advanced respiratory illness.

Eleni Karasouli, Daniel Munday, Cara Bailey, Sophie Staniszewska, Alistair Hewison, Frances Griffiths

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Emergency admissions and subsequent inpatient care through an emergency oncology service at a tertiary cancer centre: service users' experiences and views.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eleni KarasouliWarwick Manufacturing Group (WMG), University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Daniel MundayDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Cara BaileySchool of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sophie StaniszewskaDivision of Health Sciences, Royal College of Nursing Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Alistair HewisonSchool of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Frances GriffithsDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe high volume of emergency admissions to hospital is a challenge for health systems internationally. Patients with lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are frequently admitted to hospital as emergency cases. While the frequency of emergency admission has been investigated, few studies report patient experiences, particularly in relation to the decision-making process prior to emergency admission. We sought to explore patient and carer experiences and those of their healthcare professionals in the period leading up to emergency admission to hospital.

setting3 UK hospitals located in different urban and rural settings.

designQualitative critical incident study.

participants24 patients with advanced lung cancer and 15 with advanced COPD admitted to hospital as emergencies, 20 of their carers and 50 of the health professionals involved in the patients' care.

resultsThe analysis of patient, carer and professionals' interviews revealed a detailed picture of the complex processes involved leading to emergency admission to hospital. 3 phases were apparent in this period: self-management of deteriorating symptoms, negotiated decision-making and letting go. These were dynamic processes, characterised by an often rapidly changing clinical condition, uncertainty and anxiety. Patients considered their options drawing on experience, current and earlier advice. Patients tried to avoid admission, reluctantly accepting it, albeit often with a sense of relief, as anxiety increased with worsening symptoms.

conclusionsPatients with advanced respiratory illness, and their carers, try to avoid emergency admission, and use logical and complex decision-making before reluctantly accepting it. Clinicians and policy-makers need to understand this complex process when considering how to reduce emergency hospital admissions rather than focusing on identifying and labelling admissions as 'inappropriate'.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHospitalizationAnxietyCaregiversEmergency Service, HospitalHumansLung NeoplasmsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQualitative ResearchSocial SupportUnited Kingdomcancerchronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseemergency hospital servicepatient experiencesQUALITATIVE RESEARCHSOCIAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID26916687
PMCPMC4769410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.