Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26916658›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2016

Dose reduction in cone-beam CT scanning for intracranial stent deployment before coil embolization of intracranial wide-neck aneurysms.

Takumi Kuriyama, Nobuyuki Sakai, Norimitsu Niida, Masaki Sueoka, Mikiya Beppu, Chihebeddine Dahmani, Iwao Kojima, Chiaki Sakai, Hirotoshi Imamura, Katsuhiro Masago and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A new definition for wide-necked cerebral aneurysms.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Takumi KuriyamaDivision of Radiological Technology, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan kuriyama@fbri.org.
Nobuyuki SakaiDivision of Neuroendovascular Therapy, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan Division of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Norimitsu NiidaCA/IR Department, Division of Advanced Therapies, Siemens Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaki SueokaDivision of Radiological Technology, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan.
Mikiya BeppuDivision of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Chihebeddine DahmaniResearch and Collaboration Department, Siemens Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Iwao KojimaResearch and Collaboration Department, Siemens Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Chiaki SakaiDivision of Neuroendovascular Therapy, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan.
Hirotoshi ImamuraDivision of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Katsuhiro MasagoDivision of Integrated Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan.
Nobuyuki KatakamiDivision of Integrated Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFlat panel detector (FD)-equipped angiography machines are increasingly used for neuro-angiographic imaging. During intracranial stent-assisted coil embolization procedures, it is very important to clearly and quickly visualize stent shape after deployment in the vessel. It is necessary to quickly visualize stents by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The aim of this study was to compare CBCTs at 10 and 20 s, and to confirm that this method is useful for neuro-endovascular treatment procedures. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe treated 30 patients with wide-necked intracranial aneurysms with a flexible, self-expanding neurovascular stent and subsequent aneurysm embolization with platinum micro-coils. We performed the CBCT after stent deployment. We compared the 10 s and 20 s CBCTs, using the full width one-half maximum (FWHM) visualization.

resultsAccurate stent placement with subsequent coil occlusion of the aneurysms was feasible in all patients. Stent struts were clearly visualized on both 10 s and 20 s CBCTs. Importantly, 10 s CBCT can reduce the radiation dose by about 42%, compared with 20 s CBCT. Performing 10 s CBCT with a 14% dilution of the contrast medium may significantly improve image acquisition during stent-assisted coil embolization.

conclusionsReduced-dose, 10 s CBCT can visualize stents in clinical cases, while significantly reducing radiation exposure.

Indexed as

StentsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCerebral AngiographyCone-Beam Computed TomographyContrast MediaEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmIopamidolMaleMiddle AgedRadiation DosageRadiation ProtectionContrast MediaIopamidolAneurysmbraincoil embolizationcone-beam computed tomographyembolizationflat panel detectorradiation doseradiation exposurestent

Identifiers

PMID26916658
PMCPMC4984376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.