Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26916280›Full record

GuidelineThe British journal of radiology2016

Recommendations for accurate CT diagnosis of suspected acute aortic syndrome (AAS)--on behalf of the British Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (BSCI)/British Society of Cardiovascular CT (BSCCT).

Varut Vardhanabhuti, Edward Nicol, Gareth Morgan-Hughes, Carl A Roobottom, Giles Roditi, Mark C K Hamilton, Russell K Bull, Franchesca Pugliese, Michelle C Williams, James Stirrup and 5 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Varut Vardhanabhuti1 Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, John Bull Building, Plymouth, UK.
Edward Nicol3 Radiology Department, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Gareth Morgan-Hughes4 Department of Cardiology, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK.
Carl A Roobottom1 Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, John Bull Building, Plymouth, UK.
Giles Roditi6 Department of Radiology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Mark C K Hamilton7 Department of Radiology, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK.
Russell K Bull8 Department of Radiology, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, UK.
Franchesca Pugliese9 Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Michelle C Williams10 University of Edinburgh/British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
James Stirrup3 Radiology Department, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Simon Padley3 Radiology Department, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Andrew Taylor11 Cardiothoracic Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
L Ceri Davies9 Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Roger Bury12 Radiology Department, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals, Blackpool, UK.
Stephen Harden13 Department of Cardiothoracic Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and timely assessment of suspected acute aortic syndrome is crucial in this life-threatening condition. Imaging with CT plays a central role in the diagnosis to allow expedited management. Diagnosis can be made using locally available expertise with optimized scanning parameters, making full use of recent advances in CT technology. Each imaging centre must optimize their protocols to allow accurate diagnosis, to optimize radiation dose and in particular to reduce the risk of false-positive diagnosis that may simulate disease. This document outlines the principles for the acquisition of motion-free imaging of the aorta in this context.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAortic AneurysmAortic DiseasesAortic DissectionAortographyHumansPlaque, AtheroscleroticReproducibility of ResultsSocieties, MedicalSyndromeTomography, X-Ray ComputedUlcerUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID26916280
PMCPMC4985448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.