Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26916078›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2016

Manipulating Bacterial Communities by in situ Microbiome Engineering.

Ravi U Sheth, Vitor Cabral, Sway P Chen, Harris H Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Omics Technologies-Driven Research and Applications of Synthetic Biology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ravi U ShethDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Integrated Program in Cellular, Molecular and Biomedical Studies, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Vitor CabralDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sway P ChenDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Integrated Program in Cellular, Molecular and Biomedical Studies, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Harris H WangDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: hw2429@columbia.edu.

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007367 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI REINER, STEVEN L · 1985 to 2021
$25.1M
A minimally invasive synthetic bio-driven approach for natural products discoveryU01GM110714 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI BRADY, SEAN F · 2015 to 2019
$11.1M
Functional Metagenomic Reprogramming of the Human Microbiome through Mobilome EngDP5OD009172 · OD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WANG, HARRIS H · 2011 to 2015
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1U01GM110714-01NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007367NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM007367NIH HHS 1DP5OD009172-02NIH HHS DP5 OD009172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial communities inhabit our entire planet and have a crucial role in biogeochemical processes, agriculture, biotechnology, and human health. Here, we argue that 'in situ microbiome engineering' represents a new paradigm of community-scale genetic and microbial engineering. We discuss contemporary applications of this approach to directly add, remove, or modify specific sets of functions and alter community-level properties in terrestrial, aquatic, and host-associated microbial communities. Specifically, we highlight emerging in situ genome engineering approaches as tractable techniques to manipulate microbial communities with high specificity and efficacy. Finally, we describe opportunities for technological innovation and ways to bridge existing knowledge gaps to accelerate the development of in situ approaches for microbiome manipulations.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBacteriaProbioticsSafetygenome engineeringmicrobial communitiesmicrobiome engineeringphageprebioticsprobioticssynthetic biologyxenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID26916078
PMCPMC4828914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.