Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26916067›Full record

ReviewInfectious diseases of poverty2016

Moving interdisciplinary science forward: integrating participatory modelling with mathematical modelling of zoonotic disease in Africa.

Catherine Grant, Giovanni Lo Iacono, Vupenyu Dzingirai, Bernard Bett, Thomas R A Winnebah, Peter M Atkinson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. New methodologies for the estimation of population vulnerability to diseases: a case study of Lassa fever and Ebola in Nigeria and Sierra Leone.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  14. Forecasting and control of emerging infectious forest disease through participatory modelling.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Engaging research with policy and action: what are the challenges of responding to zoonotic disease in Africa?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  20. Integrative modelling for One Health: pattern, process and participation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catherine GrantESRC Social, Technological and Environmental Pathways to Sustainability (STEPS) Centre, Institute of Development Studies, Library Road, Falmer, Brighton, UK. c.grant@ids.ac.uk.
Giovanni Lo IaconoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Disease Dynamics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. gl334@cam.ac.uk.
Vupenyu DzingiraiCentre for Applied Social Sciences Trust, 5 Aberdeen Road, P O Box A1333, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe. vdzingi@gmail.com.
Bernard BettInternational Livestock Research Institute, Naivasha Road, Kabete, Nairobi, Kenya. twinnebah@yahoo.com.
Thomas R A WinnebahInstitute of Geography and Development Studies, School of Environmental Sciences, Njala University, 17, Henry Street, Freetown, Sierra Leone. twinnebah@yahoo.com.
Peter M AtkinsonGeography and Environment, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. P.M.Atkinson@soton.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review outlines the benefits of using multiple approaches to improve model design and facilitate multidisciplinary research into infectious diseases, as well as showing and proposing practical examples of effective integration. It looks particularly at the benefits of using participatory research in conjunction with traditional modelling methods to potentially improve disease research, control and management. Integrated approaches can lead to more realistic mathematical models which in turn can assist with making policy decisions that reduce disease and benefit local people. The emergence, risk, spread and control of diseases are affected by many complex bio-physical, environmental and socio-economic factors. These include climate and environmental change, land-use variation, changes in population and people's behaviour. The evidence base for this scoping review comes from the work of a consortium, with the aim of integrating modelling approaches traditionally used in epidemiological, ecological and development research. A total of five examples of the impacts of participatory research on the choice of model structure are presented. Example 1 focused on using participatory research as a tool to structure a model. Example 2 looks at identifying the most relevant parameters of the system. Example 3 concentrates on identifying the most relevant regime of the system (e.g., temporal stability or otherwise), Example 4 examines the feedbacks from mathematical models to guide participatory research and Example 5 goes beyond the so-far described two-way interplay between participatory and mathematical approaches to look at the integration of multiple methods and frameworks. This scoping review describes examples of best practice in the use of participatory methods, illustrating their potential to overcome disciplinary hurdles and promote multidisciplinary collaboration, with the aim of making models and their predictions more useful for decision-making and policy formulation.

Indexed as

AfricaAnimalsCommunicable DiseasesHumansModels, TheoreticalPolicy MakingZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID26916067
PMCPMC4766706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.