Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26915718›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2016

Prevalence of rosacea in the general population of Germany and Russia - The RISE study.

J Tan, H Schöfer, E Araviiskaia, F Audibert, N Kerrouche, M Berg, RISE study group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06952517 (Efficacy and Safety of Topical Clascoterone Cream 1% in Patients With Facial Acneiform Rosacea), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06952517 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Topical Clascoterone Cream 1% in Patients With Facial Acneiform Rosacea

TypeinterventionalSponsorNarrows Institute for Biomedical ResearchRan2025 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsPapular-pustular Rosacea, Papulopustular Rosacea (PPR), Papulopustular RosaceaArmsClascoterone Cream 1%
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Rosacea-the updated S2k guideline].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The role of vitamins and nutrients in rosacea.Archives of dermatological research · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Diagnosing and Treating Rosacea in Skin of Color Patients.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prevalence of most common skin diseases in Europe: a population-based study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

J TanUniversity of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
H SchöferUniversitätshautklinik, Klinikum der Goethe Universität, Frankfurt/M, Germany.
E AraviiskaiaFirst Pavlov State Medical University of St-Petersburg, St-Petersburg, Russia.
F AudibertGalderma R&D SNC, Sophia Antipolis, France.
N KerroucheGalderma R&D SNC, Sophia Antipolis, France.
M BergUppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
RISE study group
Galderma (France) · FRFirst Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg · RUGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUppsala University · SEWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an unmet need for general population-based epidemiological data on rosacea based on contemporary diagnostic criteria and validated population survey methodology.

objectiveTo evaluate the prevalence of rosacea in the general population of Germany and Russia.

methodsGeneral population screening was conducted in 9-10 cities per country to ensure adequate geographic representation. In Part I of this two-phase study, screening of a representative sample of the general population (every fifth person or every fifth door using a fixed-step procedure on a random route sample) was expedited with use of a questionnaire and algorithm based on current diagnostic criteria for rosacea. Of the subjects that screened positive in the initial phase, a randomly selected sample (every third subject) t`hen underwent diagnostic confirmation by a dermatologist in Part II.

resultsA total of 3052 and 3013 subjects (aged 18-65 years) were screened in Germany and Russia respectively. Rosacea prevalence was 12.3% [95%CI, 10.2-14.4] in Germany and 5.0% [95%CI, 2.8-7.2] in Russia. The profile of subjects with rosacea (75% women; mean age of 40 years; mainly skin phototype II or III, majority of subjects with sensitive facial skin) and subtype distribution were similar. Overall, 18% of subjects diagnosed with rosacea were aged 18-30 years. Over 80% were not previously diagnosed. Within the previous year, 47.5% of subjects had received no rosacea care and 23.7% had received topical and/or systemic drugs. Over one-third (35% Germany, 43% Russia) of rosacea subjects reported a moderate to severe adverse impact on quality of life.

conclusionRosacea is highly prevalent in Germany (12.3%) and Russia (5.0%). The demographic profile of rosacea subjects was similar between countries and the majority were previously undiagnosed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsRosaceaRussiaSex DistributionSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26915718
PMCPMC5067643
OpenAlexW2287025256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.