Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26915343›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2016

Long-term exercise-specific neuroprotection in spinal muscular atrophy-like mice.

Farah Chali, Céline Desseille, Léo Houdebine, Evelyne Benoit, Thaïs Rouquet, Bruno Bariohay, Philippe Lopes, Julien Branchu, Bruno Della Gaspera, Claude Pariset and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Revisiting the role of mitochondria in spinal muscular atrophy.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Advances in spinal muscular atrophy therapeutics.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Farah ChaliUniversité Paris Descartes and INSERM UMRS 1124, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, F-75270, Paris Cedex 06, France.
Céline DesseilleUniversité Paris Descartes and INSERM UMRS 1124, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, F-75270, Paris Cedex 06, France.
Léo HoudebineUniversité Paris Descartes and INSERM UMRS 1124, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, F-75270, Paris Cedex 06, France.
Evelyne BenoitInstitut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay UMR 9197, CNRS, Bât 32-33, and Service d'Ingénierie Moléculaire des Protéines (DSV/iBiTec-S/SIMOPRO), CEA de Saclay, Bât. 152, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Thaïs RouquetBIOMEOSTASIS, Nutritional behavior and metabolic disorders, FST St Jérôme, Service B52, Avenue Escadrille Normandie-Niemen, 13397, Marseille, France.
Bruno BariohayBIOMEOSTASIS, Nutritional behavior and metabolic disorders, FST St Jérôme, Service B52, Avenue Escadrille Normandie-Niemen, 13397, Marseille, France.
Philippe LopesUniversité Paris Descartes and INSERM UMRS 1124, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, F-75270, Paris Cedex 06, France.
Julien BranchuUniversité Paris Descartes and INSERM UMRS 1124, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, F-75270, Paris Cedex 06, France.
Bruno Della GasperaUniversité Paris Descartes and INSERM UMRS 1124, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, F-75270, Paris Cedex 06, France.
Claude ParisetUniversité Paris Descartes and INSERM UMRS 1124, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, F-75270, Paris Cedex 06, France.
Christophe ChanoineUniversité Paris Descartes and INSERM UMRS 1124, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, F-75270, Paris Cedex 06, France.
Frédéric CharbonnierUniversité Paris Descartes and INSERM UMRS 1124, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, F-75270, Paris Cedex 06, France.
Olivier BiondiUniversité Paris Descartes and INSERM UMRS 1124, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, F-75270, Paris Cedex 06, France.
Délégation Paris 5 · FRInserm · FRNutrition, Obésité et Risque Thrombotique · FRCEA Paris-Saclay · FRUniversité d'Évry Val-d'Essonne · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsThe real impact of physical exercise parameters, i.e. intensity, type of contraction and solicited energetic metabolism, on neuroprotection in the specific context of neurodegeneration remains poorly explored. In this study behavioural, biochemical and cellular analyses were conducted to compare the effects of two different long-term exercise protocols, high intensity swimming and low intensity running, on motor units of a type 3 spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)-like mouse model. Our data revealed a preferential SMA-induced death of intermediate and fast motor neurons which was limited by the swimming protocol only, suggesting a close relationship between neuron-specific protection and their activation levels by specific exercise. The exercise-induced neuroprotection was independent of SMN protein expression and associated with specific metabolic and behavioural adaptations with notably a swimming-induced reduction of muscle fatigability. Our results provide new insight into the motor units' adaptations to different physical exercise parameters and will contribute to the design of new active physiotherapy protocols for patient care. ABSTRACT: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a group of autosomal recessive neurodegenerative diseases differing in their clinical outcome, characterized by the specific loss of spinal motor neurons, caused by insufficient level of expression of the protein survival of motor neuron (SMN). No cure is at present available for SMA. While physical exercise might represent a promising approach for alleviating SMA symptoms, the lack of data dealing with the effects of different exercise types on diseased motor units still precludes the use of active physiotherapy in SMA patients. In the present study, we have evaluated the efficiency of two long-term physical exercise paradigms, based on either high intensity swimming or low intensity running, in alleviating SMA symptoms in a mild type 3 SMA-like mouse model. We found that 10 months' physical training induced significant benefits in terms of resistance to muscle damage, energetic metabolism, muscle fatigue and motor behaviour. Both exercise types significantly enhanced motor neuron survival, independently of SMN expression, leading to the maintenance of neuromuscular junctions and skeletal muscle phenotypes, particularly in the soleus, plantaris and tibialis of trained mice. Most importantly, both exercises significantly improved neuromuscular excitability properties. Further, all these training-induced benefits were quantitatively and qualitatively related to the specific characteristics of each exercise, suggesting that the related neuroprotection is strongly dependent on the specific activation of some motor neuron subpopulations. Taken together, the present data show significant long-term exercise benefits in type 3 SMA-like mice providing important clues for designing rehabilitation programmes in patients.

Indexed as

Physical ExertionAnimalsEvoked Potentials, MotorMiceMuscle, SkeletalMuscular Atrophy, SpinalPhysical Conditioning, AnimalRunningSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 ProteinSwimmingSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 Protein

Identifiers

PMID26915343
PMCPMC4818605
OpenAlexW2274881250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.