Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26915076›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2016

Reducing Polypharmacy from the Perspectives of General Practitioners and Older Patients: A Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.

Beate Bokhof, Ulrike Junius-Walker

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03689049 (SPIDER), which is not on this map. Cited by 65 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03689049 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

SPIDER: A Structured Process Informed by Data, Evidence and Research - A Research and Quality Improvement Collaboration Supporting Practices in Improving Care for Complex Elderly Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Toronto Practice Based Research NetworkRan2018 to 2027Enrolled104ConditionsPolypharmacy, Inappropriate Prescribing, Aged, Primary Health CareArmsSPIDER, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Beate BokhofInstitute of General Practice, Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany. Bokhof.beate@mh-hannover.de.
Ulrike Junius-WalkerInstitute of General Practice, Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolypharmacy, common in elderly multimorbid adults, leads to increased iatrogenic health risks. Yet, no consistent approach to stopping medicines exists in primary healthcare.

objectivesOur objective was to synthesize qualitative studies exploring the perspectives and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) and older patients in reducing polypharmacy and to discover approaches already being practiced.

methodsWe conducted a search in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus databases to identify qualitative studies in the primary care setting addressing multimorbid older patients and polypharmacy reduction. The seven-step model of meta-ethnography allowed for cross-interpretation between studies considering their original context and developing theories.

resultsA total of 14 studies from the perspectives of patients (n = 6) and providers (n = 8) were included, although discontinuing medicines only occurred as a sub-theme in patient studies. Emerging key concepts for patients were experimenting with medicines, attitudes and experiences towards medicines, necessity of prioritizing treatments, relationship to GP, and system-related contributors. For GPs, they covered assumptions about elderly patients, interface prescribing problems, evidence-based guidelines, failure to meet the challenge of complex decision-making, and solutions. DISCUSSION: Complex medication regimens and uncertainties in decision making are challenges for both GPs and patients. For patients, symptom experiences with medicines, relationship with their prescriber, and fragmented care are at the forefront; for GPs, it is the decision-making responsibility in the context of unsuitable guidelines, time constraints, and deficient multidisciplinary co-operation. Heuristics such as prioritizing and individualizing treatments and relaxation of guidelines emerged. These strategies require professional awareness of the problem and establishing a trusting, patient-centered consultation style and supportive work conditions.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionPolypharmacyAgedAgingDecision MakingEvidence-Based MedicineGeneral PractitionersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareQualitative Research

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.