Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26915019›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2016

[Cardioprotection in cardiac surgical patients : Everything good comes from the heart].

C Stoppe, P Meybohm, M Coburn, A Goetzenich

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03442946 (International Nutrition Survey 2018), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03442946 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

International Nutrition Survey 2018

TypeobservationalSponsorRWTH Aachen UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled280ConditionsCardiovascular Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C StoppeKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland. christian.stoppe@gmail.com.
P MeybohmKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Deutschland.
M CoburnKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.
A GoetzenichKlinik für Thorax-, Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland.
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite substantial success in the anesthetic and surgical management of cardiac surgery, patients frequently show postoperative complications and organ dysfunctions. This is highly relevant for mid- to long-term outcomes.

objectivesTo evaluate cardioprotective strategies that may offer effective protection in vulnerable cardiac surgery patients.

methodsTo demonstrate recent cardioprotective approaches for cardiac surgery patients, aiming to modulate the body's own protective mechanisms in cardiac surgery patients.

resultsBoth cardioplegia and hypothermia belong to the well-established protective strategies during myocardial ischemia. Volatile anesthetics have been repeatedly shown to improve the left ventricular function and reduce the extent of myocardial injury compared to a control group with intravenous anesthesia. Furthermore, patients receiving volatile anesthetics showed a significantly shortened stay in the ICU and in hospital after cardiac surgery. In contrast, numerous other protective strategies failed translation into the clinical practice. Despite the published reduction of troponin release after remote ischemic preconditioning, two recent large-scale randomized multicenter trials were unable to demonstrate a clinical benefit.

conclusionsBeside the use of cardioplegia and hypothermia, the use of volatile anesthetics is well-established during cardiac surgery because of its conditioning and protective properties. Regardless of the promising results derived from experimental studies and small clinical trials, the majority of other approaches failed to translate their findings into the clinic. Therefore, systematic experimental studies are needed to identify potential confounding factors that may affect the protective effects.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresHeartHeart DiseasesHumansIschemic Preconditioning, MyocardialPostoperative ComplicationsCardiac surgeryCardioprotectionConditioningInflammationIschemia-reperfusionOrgan injury

Identifiers

PMID26915019
OpenAlexW2278890942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.