Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26914936›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2016

Ultrasound and MR imaging findings in prenatal diagnosis of craniosynostosis syndromes.

Eva I Rubio, Anna Blask, Dorothy I Bulas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic Disorders Detectable by Fetal MRI: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Prenatal ultrasonography of craniofacial abnormalities.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eva I RubioDepartment of Radiology, Children's National Health System, 111 Michigan Ave. NW, Washington, DC, 20010, USA. erubio@childrensnational.org.
Anna BlaskDepartment of Radiology, Children's National Health System, 111 Michigan Ave. NW, Washington, DC, 20010, USA.
Dorothy I BulasDepartment of Radiology, Children's National Health System, 111 Michigan Ave. NW, Washington, DC, 20010, USA.
Children's National · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCraniosynostosis syndromes are uncommonly encountered in the prenatal period. Identification is challenging but important for family counseling and perinatal management.

objectiveThis series examines prenatal findings in craniosynostosis syndromes, comparing the complementary roles of US and MRI and emphasizing clues easily missed in the second trimester. MATERIALS AND

methodsSix prenatal cases evaluated from 2002 through 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Referral history, gestational age, and sonographic and MRI findings were reviewed by three pediatric radiologists. Abnormalities of the calvarium, hands, feet, face, airway and central nervous system were compared between modalities.

resultsThe diagnosis was Apert syndrome in three, Pfeiffer syndrome in two and Carpenter syndrome in one. The gestational age at evaluation ranged from 21 to 33 weeks. All six were evaluated by MRI and US, with two undergoing repeat evaluation in the third trimester, yielding a total of eight MRIs and US exams. The referral history suggested cloverleaf skull in two cases but did not suggest craniosynostosis syndrome in any case. In four, the referral suggested central nervous system (CNS) findings that were not confirmed by MRI; additional CNS findings were discovered in the remaining two. In four cases, developing turricephaly resulted in a characteristic "lampshade" contour of the fetal head. Hypertelorism and proptosis were present in five, with proptosis better appreciated by MRI. Digit abnormalities were present in all, seen equally well by MRI and US. Lung abnormalities in the second trimester in one fetus resolved by the third trimester.

conclusionPrenatal diagnosis of craniosynostosis syndromes is difficult prior to the third trimester. MRI and US have complementary roles in evaluation of these patients.

Indexed as

CraniosynostosesDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic ErrorsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePregnancyPregnancy Trimester, SecondReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySyndromeUltrasonography, PrenatalApert syndromeCarpenter syndromeCraniosynostosisFetusMagnetic resonance imagingPfeiffer syndromeSyndactylyUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID26914936
OpenAlexW2287836130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.