Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26914264›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2016

Additional validity evidence for the PROMIS Smoking Assessment Toolkit.

Maria O Edelen, Wenjing Huang, Brian D Stucky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Measuring Nicotine Dependence Among Adolescent and Young Adult Cigarillo Users.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  5. E-cigarette Dependence Measures in Dual Users: Reliability and Relations With Dependence Criteria and E-cigarette Cessation.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Observational
  6. Psychometric Evaluation of the E-cigarette Dependence Scale.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria O EdelenRAND Corporation, United States. Electronic address: Orlando@rand.org.
Wenjing HuangRAND Corporation, United States.
Brian D StuckyRAND Corporation, United States.

Funding

DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A SMOKING MODULE FOR PROMISR01DA026943 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI EDELEN, MARIA ORLANDO · 2009 to 2013
$2.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Smoking Initiative has developed six item banks for assessing smoking behaviors and biopsychosocial correlates of smoking among daily and nondaily adult cigarette smokers. This paper presents new validity evidence for the item banks including correlations of the item banks to the existing legacy measures of smoking (Fagerström Test of Nicotine Dependence (FTND), Questionnaire of Smoking Urges (QSU), and the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM)).

methodsUsing data from a follow-up sample (N=491) and a community sample (N=369) of adult daily and nondaily smokers, we replicated the findings from Edelen et al. (2014a) and examined the correlations of legacy smoking measures with the new item bank scores.

resultsPreliminary validity findings were largely replicated with the new data. Correlations among the banks are moderate and bank score associations with measures of smoking behavior, quitting history, and other PROMIS measures follow expected patterns (e.g., nicotine dependence is most strongly associated with smoking quantity and time to first cigarette of the day; health and psychosocial expectancies are most related to quitting recency and interest). Correlations of bank scores with legacy measures are moderate to strong. The PROMIS nicotine dependence scores were most strongly associated with the legacy instruments.

conclusionsThese analyses provide strong evidence for the validity of the PROMIS Smoking item banks in two independent samples.

Indexed as

MotivationAdultDatabases, FactualFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSmokingSmoking CessationSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco Use DisorderNicotine dependencePROMIS smokingSmoking assessmentValidity

Identifiers

PMID26914264
PMCPMC4808349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.