ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2017
Patient engagement in the process of planning and designing outpatient care improvements at the Veterans Administration Health-care System: findings from an online expert panel.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Client satisfaction with abortion care service and its associated factors among women in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC women's health · 2024Pooled it
- Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Patient and public engagement in priority setting: A systematic rapid review of the literature.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Partner engagement for planning and development of non-pharmacological care pathways in the AIM-Back trial.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2023Trial
- Patient Engagement Activities and Infrastructure Among US Veterans Affairs National Research Networks.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing the feasibility and likelihood of policy options to lower specialty drug costs.Health affairs scholar · 2024Article
- Hospital Quality Indicators for Opioid-Exposed Infants: Results From an Expert Consensus Panel.Pediatrics · 2024Article
- Article
- Consensus-Based Guidance on Opioid Management in Individuals With Advanced Cancer-Related Pain and Opioid Misuse or Use Disorder.JAMA oncology · 2022Article
- "Nothing for Us Without Us": An Evaluation of Patient Engagement in an HIV Care Improvement Collaborative in the Caribbean.Global health, science and practice · 2022Article
- Expert views on state-level naloxone access laws: a qualitative analysis of an online modified-Delphi process.Harm reduction journal · 2022Article
- Mapping the role of patient and public involvement during the different stages of healthcare innovation: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Prevalence and determinants of women's satisfaction on the quality of safe abortion service in Northwest Ethiopia.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022Article
- Informing the Development of a Standardized Clinical Definition of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Protocol for a Modified-Delphi Expert Panel.JMIR research protocols · 2021Article
- Practical factors determining adolescent substance use treatment settings: Results from four online stakeholder panels.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2020Article
- Using an Online, Modified Delphi Approach to Engage Patients and Caregivers in Determining the Patient-Centeredness of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Care Considerations.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2019Article
- Article
- Development of a veteran engagement toolkit for researchers.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2018Article
- Comparative analysis of stakeholder experiences with an online approach to prioritizing patient-centered research topics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Article
- Engaging Patients and Caregivers Managing Rare Diseases to Improve the Methods of Clinical Guideline Development: A Research Protocol.JMIR research protocols · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThere is a strong interest in the Veterans Administration (VA) Health-care System in promoting patient engagement to improve patient care.
methodsWe solicited expert opinion using an online expert panel system with a modified Delphi structure called ExpertLens
findingsExperts rated consulting with patients at the local level as the most desirable and feasible patient engagement approach. Engagement at the local level was considered more desirable than engagement at the regional level. Being an equal stakeholder at the local level received the highest ratings on the patient-centredness and health-care quality criteria.
conclusionsOur findings illustrate expert opinion about different approaches to patient engagement and highlight the benefits and challenges posed by each. Although experts rated local consultations with patients on an as-needed basis as most desirable and feasible, they rated being an equal stakeholder at the local level as having the highest potential impact on patient-centredness and care quality. This result highlights a perceived discrepancy between what is most desirable and what is potentially most effective, but suggests that routine local engagement of patients as equal stakeholders may be a desirable first step for promoting high-quality, patient-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.