Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26913933›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition2016

Does reactivating a witnessed memory increase its susceptibility to impairment by subsequent misinformation?

Eric J Rindal, Rachel M DeFranco, Patrick R Rich, Maria S Zaragoza

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The cognitive neuroscience of memory representations.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Is Reconsolidation a General Property of Memory?Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  7. Protecting memory from misinformation: Warnings modulate cortical reinstatement during memory retrieval.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric J RindalDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University.
Rachel M DeFrancoDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University.
Patrick R RichDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University.
Maria S ZaragozaDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a recent

Indexed as

CommunicationMemoryVisual PerceptionFemaleHumansMalePsychological TestsRandom AllocationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26913933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.