Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26913808›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2016

L-type Ca

Z D Kabir, A S Lee, A M Rajadhyaksha

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Deletion ofFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Astrocytic abnormalities in brain-specificChannels (Austin, Tex.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Deletion ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Novel non-stimulants rescue hyperactive phenotype in an adgrl3.1 mutant zebrafish model of ADHD.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. CaNeuropharmacology · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Deletion ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Z D KabirDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
A S LeeDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
A M RajadhyakshaDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. amr2011@med.cornell.edu.
Cornell University · USMIND Research Institute · US

Funding

The Role of Cav1.2 L-type Ca2+ Channels in Cocaine-Induced ReinstatementR01DA029122 · NIDA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI RAJADHYAKSHA, ANJALI M · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
Cav1.2 as a novel target for cocaine addiction pharmacotherapyF31DA032169 · NIDA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LEE, ANNI SEUNGEUN · 2012 to 2015
$147k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA032169NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain Ca

Indexed as

AffectAnimalsBehavior, AddictiveCalcium Channels, L-TypeCognitionEndophenotypesHumansCalcium Channels, L-Type

Identifiers

PMID26913808
PMCPMC5063939
OpenAlexW2410887937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.