Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26913722›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2016

Molecular-cytogenetic characterization of C-genome chromosome substitution lines in Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss.

Mehak Gupta, Annaliese S Mason, Jacqueline Batley, Sakshi Bharti, Shashi Banga, Surinder S Banga

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Introgression of Heterotic Genomic Segments fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Development and use of chromosome segment substitution lines as a genetic resource for crop improvement.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular-cytogenetic characterization of C-genome chromosome substitution lines in Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mehak GuptaDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, DBT Centre of Excellence on Brassicas, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141001, India.
Annaliese S MasonSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Jacqueline BatleySchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Sakshi BhartiDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, DBT Centre of Excellence on Brassicas, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141001, India.
Shashi BangaDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, DBT Centre of Excellence on Brassicas, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141001, India.
Surinder S BangaDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, DBT Centre of Excellence on Brassicas, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141001, India. nppbg@pau.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8209-7341

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageC genome chromosome substitution lines of B. juncea constitute a key genetic resource for increased genetic diversity and hybrid performance. C genome chromosome substitution lines were found in the progenies of derived B. juncea (2n = 36; AABB), synthesized through hybridization between B. napus and B. carinata. These were originally recognized based on the morphology and genomic in situ hybridization. Genotyping using the Brassica Illumina 60K Infinium SNP array confirmed the presence of C genome chromosomes in a large number of derived B. juncea genotypes. Three whole chromosome substitutions and 13 major C genome fragment substitutions were identified. Fragment substitutions were primarily terminal, but intercalary substitution(s) involving chromosome C1 and C2 were identified in three genotypes. The size of substituted C genome fragments varied from 0.04 Mbp (C1) to 64.85 Mbp (C3). In terms of proportions, these ranged from 0.10 % (C1) to 100 % (C1, C3 and C7) of the substituted chromosome. SSR genotyping with B genome specific primers suggested that substituting C genome chromosome(s) are likely to have replaced B genome chromosome(s). C1 was the most common substituting chromosome while substituted B chromosome seemed random. Study of the phenotypic traits underlined the importance of the substitution lines (especially of chromosome C1) for conferring superior trait performance (main shoot length and pods on the main shoot). High heterosis was also indicated in hybrid combinations of substitution lines with natural B. juncea. These substitution genotypes constituted a valuable resource for targeted gene transfer and QTL identification.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome, PlantHybridization, GeneticChromosomes, PlantDNA, PlantGenotypeHybrid VigorIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMustard PlantPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA, Plant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.